Use of seismic technology to divert, herd, or eradicate invasive Asian carp from the Great Lakes ecosystem

Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center

Research at the NOROCK is focused on developing sound energy barriers to prevent the expansion of two types of invasive Asian Carp in the Great Lakes ecosystem, bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Preliminary experiments have been conducted on Asian carp and non-target organisms to evaluate behavioral and physiological responses to the sound energy levels produced by water guns. Studies in 2011 are directed at the establishment of stationary and mobile barriers and the characterization of frequencies and energy levels that will divert Asian carp in the Chicago Sanitary and Shipping Canal.

In the 1960’s oil exploration companies began towing seismic air gun technology behind large vessels to explore the composition of the ocean floor using pulse pressure technology. Later in the early 1980s the water gun was developed to generate a cleaner signal by eliminating the interference produced by the air gun. Though water guns were developed as an alternate means of seismic exploration they were quickly discontinued because they were less efficient at producing low frequency energy and there were concerns about their effect on aquatic life. Today, it is those same properties of water guns that may provide the means to establish an acoustic barrier deterrent for Asian carp.

Pulse pressure technology is currently being evaluated as a means to control other aquatic invasive species throughout the US. The USGS along with the US Bureau of Reclamation is conducting studies with water guns and air guns. This research is exploring the feasibility of using these technologies to mitigate the effects of biofouling organisms such as quagga mussels (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis) and zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) on hydropower production. Researchers are assessing the capability of pulse pressure to remove attached mussels from substrate or even prevent settlement on water delivery and hydropower structures. The USGS and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game are also evaluating the use of water guns as a means of suppression to control invasive Northern pike (Esox lucius) in order to protect and conserve Pacific salmonids. These studies will expand our knowledge of water gun technology and other potential uses for the protection of our infrastructure and the conservation of our fishery resources.

Why Water Guns?

Water guns offer three mechanisms by which to deter carp: 1) the use of sound at frequencies Asian carp hear, 2) a pressure wave, and 3) two high velocity water jets.

Water Gun graphic by USGS

Water Gun graphic by USGS

The water gun signature is short and clean compared to that of the air gun (Figure 1). The water gun has a low amplitude precursor pulse that is followed by the main implosion which produces a large positive spike. This is followed by a similarly shaped negative peak as the pulse is reflected off of the water’s surface. After this the pressure quickly stabilizes.

The water gun operates as a low energy, implosive source which produces a short, bubble-free pulse (Figure 2). The implosion of the cavity is created by the jet of high-pressure water expelled from the gun. These guns have dual chamber/piston assembly. Upon firing the gun high-pressure air in the upper chamber propels the firing piston into the lower chamber which then ejects the water through the ports at the base of the gun. When the piston decelerates a cavity is formed behind the expelled water. The main acoustic pulse is created when this cavity implodes due to the surrounding hydrostatic pressure.

Source

Visit Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center (NOROCK)

Cambodia: China pervasive, US welcome

Milton Osbourne for The Lowy Interpreter

Even a short visit to Cambodia earlier this month is sufficient to underline why Prime Minister Hun Sen has been so ready over many years to describe China as his country’s best friend. Discussion of China’s aid to the country is a constant in almost every conversation.

In December 2011 Hun Sen inaugurated a major 103 MW dam at Kamchay in Kampot province built by Sinohydro, one of the largest Chinese construction groups, the latest major infrastructure project built with Chinese assistance at a cost of US$208 million.

Ramsar Site 999 - Just North of Stung Treng on The Mekong River

Ramsar Site 999 - Just North of Stung Treng on The Mekong River. Pic: Mouth to Source

In preceding years (and as Hun Sen always insists, ‘without strings’) Chinese aid to Cambodia has ranged from the construction of a bridge over the Se San River in Stung Treng province, through road construction, to the provision of military vehicles and uniforms for the Cambodia army. In May 2010 alone China committed itself to total aid of US$1.2 billion in grants and loans at a time when a US shipment of military vehicles had been frozen.

With the Kamchay dam completed, there are plans for two more Chinese-built dams in the Cardamom Mountains of Pursat province. Like Kamchay, their construction will be for the generation of hydroelectricity, but unlike Kamchay, the proposed dams will be sited on rivers that eventually flow into the Mekong River system. This raises familiar concerns about the degradation of fish stocks, an issue that has been at the heart of the opposition to the construction of the Xayaburi dam on the Mekong’s mainstream.

For the moment, dams on the Mekong’s mainstream have been held at bay, but the new environmental battleground is going to be what happens on the Mekong’s tributaries. The most contentious proposed dam is not one with Chinese involvement; this is the proposed dam on the Se San River in Stung Treng province, with proposed funding coming from Electricite du Vietnam and the Cambodian conglomerate, the Royal Group.

Bag of fish on sale early morning market - Stung Treng - Cambodia

Bag of fish on sale early morning market - Stung Treng - Cambodia Pic: Mouth to Source

Arguments for and against each of these projects boil down to whether the generation of hydroelectricity is more important than preserving wild rivers for the fish found in them. So far as the proposed Se Sam dam is concerned, Hun Sen has made his judgment, stating that ‘the Se San and Sre Pok Rivers are not the source for fish breeding for fisheries across Cambodia’.

Although China has a ‘flavour of the decade’ character, there is no doubt the Cambodian Government has hopes for greater American involvement in its economy too.

Bayon Temple and catapult Pic: Mouth to Source

Bayon Temple and catapult Pic: Mouth to Source

My travel through Cambodia was in the company of a group of senior American businessmen for whom the Cambodian Government pulled out every stop: a reception in the new Peace Palace in Phnom Penh, the presence of Deputy Prime Minister Sok An at a formal dinner, and to top it all, dinner under the stars by a flood-lit Bayon temple in the Angkor Archeological Park. This was a welcome that went beyond mere courtesy.

Source

Visit The Lowy

Riverside Guide Updates for 2012-01-25