logo
Already a member? Login here

conflict´s archives ↓

Bushmen launch appeal over right to water

Survival International

The Bushmen of Botswana have lodged an appeal against a High Court decision that denied them access to water on their ancestral lands.

In July, Justice Walia dismissed the Bushmen’s application for permission to use a well on their lands inside the Central Kalahari Game Reserve, expressing sympathy for the government’s position that ‘having chosen to settle at an uncomfortably distant location, [the Bushmen] have brought upon themselves any discomfort they may endure.’

The ruling came a week before the UN formally recognized water as a fundamental human right. It has also been condemned by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Africa’s key human rights body, for denying the ‘right to life’ enshrined in the African Charter.

In 2002, the Bushmen were evicted from their lands by the Botswana government; a move declared by the High Court as illegal and unconstitutional. However, despite the ruling, the government continues to prevent Bushmen from returning home by banning them from accessing a well which they rely on for water. Without it, they are forced to make arduous journeys to fetch water from outside their reserve.

The Bushmen launched legal proceedings in a bid to gain access to the well, which the government sealed and capped during the 2002 evictions. Even though the Bushmen have said they will raise the funds required to operate the well, the government claims that they need permission to do so and has refused to give it.

At the same time, the government has created new wells for wildlife in the reserve, allowed the opening of a Wilderness Safaris tourist lodge with swimming pool on Bushman land, and is due to “give the go ahead for a diamond mine” at one of the Bushman communities.

Botswana’s president, Ian Khama, who sits on the board of Conservation International, has described the Bushmen’s way of life as ‘an archaic fantasy’.

Bushman spokesman, Jumanda Gakelebone, said, ‘Like all human beings, we can’t live without water. We, the Bushmen, are appealing for our basic human right, and the world is watching’.

Source and more links here…

Visit Survival International

Read also: Q&A: James G. Workman on the Bushmen’s Fight for Water Rights and 21st Century Hydro-Democracy at Circle of Blue

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Brazil’s President signs ‘death sentence’ for Amazonian river

Survival International

Brazil’s President Lula has signed a contract allowing the construction of the hugely controversial Belo Monte mega-dam on the Amazonian Xingu River to go ahead.

Lula said, ‘I think this is a victory for Brazil’s energy sector’.

Belo Monte, if built, will be the third largest dam in the world. It will devastate the local environment and threaten the lives of the thousands of indigenous people living in the area, whose land and food sources will be seriously damaged.

Experts have warned that the project has serious design flaws. It was described by Walter Coronado Antunes, former Environment Secretary of São Paulo state, as ‘the worst engineering project in the history of hydroelectric dams in Brazil, and perhaps of any engineering project in the world’.

Indians, together with human rights and environmental organizations have traveled to Brazil’s capital, Brasília, to protest against Lula’s signing of the contract. They said, ‘The government has signed a death warrant for the Xingu river and condemned thousands of residents to expulsion’.

Brazilian and international organizations have published a Declaration against the Belo Monte dam, describing the signing of the contract as a ‘death sentence for the Xingu River’, and a ‘scandalous affront to international human rights conventions, Brazilian law and the Brazilian constitution’.

Marcos Apurinã of the Coordinating Body of Indigenous Organizations of the Brazilian Amazon (COIAB), said, ‘Our government is presenting itself as an example to the world. But here in Brazil, at least for indigenous peoples, it is not exemplary at all!’.

The Indians have warned that if the dam is constructed, a ‘war’ could start and the Xingu could become a ‘river of blood’.

They have organized several protests against the project. Hundreds of Indians are currently participating in a protest, alongside experts, human rights and environmental organizations, and Brazil’s Public Ministry, against the Belo Monte dam, as well as the dams on the Madeira, Teles Pires and Tapajós rivers.

Survival International recently published a report highlighting the devastating impacts that dams are bringing to tribal peoples worldwide.

Source…and many links

Visit Survival International

Survival Internationals – ‘Serious Damage’, can be download from this page…

Interactive map of Dams in Amazonia here…

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Environmental stresses in Pakistan

From Nick Fielding. Circling The Lion’s Den

A very timely report from the US Congressional Research Service focuses on the nexus between security and environmental concerns in Pakistan that may affect US security and foreign policy interests.

With much of the country presently submerged beneath flood waters and outbreaks of violence reported in some of the temporary camps set up to deal with the millions of displaced people, the report’s authors are right to be concerned.

Read article…and links here

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

“Dam rush” would Devastate Amazon Ecosystems and People

From International Rivers

New Online Map Plots 140 Large Dams Planned for the Amazon

An interactive online database and map launched today graphically illustrates the impacts from more than 140 large dams at various stages of planning in the Amazon Basin. This unique resource, available at www.dams-info.org, uses official sources of information to document the shocking number of dams planned in the Amazon Basin in Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, and outlines the devastation these projects would bring to the river and its peoples.

The Amazon plays a key role in regulating the world’s climate and is an area of extraordinary biodiversity. The largest and arguably the most important river basin in the world, the Amazon contains 60% of the world’s remaining tropical rainforest. However, the more than 140 dam projects described in the database threaten irrevocable damage to the Amazon’s biological integrity and to local populations whose livelihoods depend upon healthy riverine ecosystems.

Available in English, Spanish and Portuguese, the “Dams in Amazonia” database presents technical and economic data about existing, planned and partly built dams. In the Brazilian Amazon alone, more than 60 dams are planned; neighboring countries such as Peru, Bolivia and Colombia also have plans for massive projects.

“It’s astounding to see the plans that governments and the dam industry have for the world’s most important river basin. If all these projects are built, it would be catastrophic for the Amazon ecosystem and the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of indigenous people and riverbank dwellers who depend on the river for survival,” said Brent Millikan, Amazon Program Director for International Rivers.

“For the next phase of this project, we plan to incorporate other useful sources of data, such as overlay maps of indigenous lands and conversation units, as well as transmission lines, in order to better illustrate how many dam projects will directly impact sensitive protected areas.” said Millikan.

“We hope the information in this online resource will be of great interest for governments, researchers, educators and non governmental organizations. The development of the database was technically challenging as it involved the participation of experts from seven countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Peru and the United States,” explained Federico González Brizzio, communications coordinator for Fundación PROTEGER, who was in charge of designing the database.

“The information was compiled largely from official sources and from the companies involved, and was cross-checked with information provided by researchers and civil society organizations. Where there was divergences in information, this is noted with reference to the different sources, making the site more useful for people interested in obtaining detailed and reliable information,” said Brizzio.

The site was developed by Fundación PROTEGER of Argentina and International Rivers of the US, with the financial support of ECOA, Brazil.

Media Contacts:

Federico González Brizzio, Fundación PROTEGER, Argentina, comunicacion@proteger.org.ar, Tel: +54 9351 307599

Brent Millikan, International Rivers, Brazil, brent@internationalrivers.org, Tel: +55 61-8153-7009

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Who Owns the Rain—When Thirsty Democracies Deny Individual Liberty to Water

James Workman in a special for Circle of Blue

For 30,000 years Bushmen have lived in the Kalahari Desert and for eight years Botswana has tried to force them out. Recently, under a quiet policy of forced dehydration, the government declared Bushmen could no longer dig for or carry their own water.

It may seem an odd blip in a distant land, but the official ruling has implications for thirsty people in all modern democracies—including ours. It raises uneasy questions about individual liberty and limited government, namely: Whose water is it, anyway?

Water is arguably humanity’s oldest political bond. U.S. citizens may differ by age, class, race, gender, tribe, religion, or party. But we are all, quite literally, connected to each other through a vertically integrated water system that links national rivers to our household meters.

Here’s how it works. Federal laws divvy up rivers among states; state commissions allocate water to farms, industry or cities; municipalities pipe water to and from 309 million Americans. From Roman to Californian aqueducts, water unites us.

Conversely, water shortages divide us. Scarcity breeds social distrust, turns neighbors into rivals and undermines political security.

Read article…

Visit Circle of Blue

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Pakistan flood survivors protest slow aid

By ASHRAF KHAN for AP

SUKKUR, Pakistan — Angry flood survivors in Pakistan blocked a highway to protest slow delivery of aid and heavy rain lashed makeshift housing Monday as a forecast of more flooding increased the urgency of the massive international relief effort.

Pakistan’s worst floods in recorded history began more than two weeks ago in the mountainous northwest and have spread throughout the country. Some 20 million people and 62,000 square miles (160,000 square kilometers) of land — about one-fifth of the country — have been affected.

The scale of the disaster has raised concerns it could destabilize the country, which is pivotal to U.S. hopes of defeating al-Qaida and the Taliban.

Hundreds of victims blocked a major highway with stones and garbage near the hard-hit Sukkur area, complaining they were being treated like animals. Protester Kalu Mangiani said government officials only came to hand out food when media were present.

“They are throwing packets of food to us like we are dogs. They are making people fight for these packets,” he said.

The Sindh irrigation minister, Jam Saifullah Dharejo, said the dam in Sukkur faced a major test of its strength as floodwaters coursed down the Indus River into Pakistan’s highly populated agricultural heartland.

“The coming four to five days are still crucial,” he said.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon flew over the flood-hit area Sunday and said he had never seen a disaster on such a scale. He urged the international community to speed up assistance.

Read article…on Google news

Visit AP

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Historic Indigenous Summit Calls for Halting Brazil’s Belo Monte Dam

International Rivers

Hundreds Converge on the Xingu River in Altamira to Highlight Threats from Mega-infrastructure Projects in the Amazon

Altamira, Brazil – Hundreds of indigenous leaders from throughout the Brazilian Amazon Basin joined local riverbank dwellers and dam-affected people this week for the historic Terra Livre Regional Encampment. Bearing the message “Defend the Xingu: Stop Belo Monte,” participants occupied the riverside port of Altamira, Pará to discuss threats posed by major infrastructure projects in the Amazon, in particular the controversial Belo Monte Dam on the Xingu River.

Organized by the Coordinating Body of Indigenous Organizations of the Brazilian Amazon – COIAB, and backed by a coalition of Brazilian and international organizations, the Encampment represents a seminal meeting for indigenous resistance to Belo Monte Dam. Hundreds of indigenous leaders from 27 ethnic groups in the Brazilian Amazon converged, joined by local communities, NGOs and leading academics. Participants discussed the harmful impacts of large infrastructure projects on the Amazon’s ecologically and culturally sensitive rainforests and the response by indigenous and social movements in the face of such threats.

Choosing to hold the summit in Altamira, a city that would be partially flooded by the planned dam, positions the Belo Monte project and the Brazilian government’s Accelerated Growth Program (PAC) as top priorities in the battle for indigenous rights and for a more ecologically sound development path.

Among the indigenous participants at the encampment is the renowned Chief Raoni Metuktire of the Kayapo people, a highly respected leader who has been instrumental in efforts to protect the Xingu River basin for over 30 years. “We must never give up, because we are fighting for a right that is ours!” said Raoni in an address to a gathering of over 500 people. “Nature is life, it has sustained us until today, so we have to defend Nature as our father and mother who give us life….Is this [dam] what we really want, my friends? Let us stand together against Belo Monte!”

Speakers at the gathering presented the myriad problems posed by the planned mega-dam, including catastrophic environmental impacts to the Xingu River Basin and the violation of the rights of local populations. In addition, the project’s technical viability has come into question. According to Antonia Melo, a leader and spokesperson for the Xingu Alive Forever Movement, “There are huge design flaws being uncovered in Belo Monte Dam’s construction plans, raising further doubts about its economic viability and socio-environmental impacts. For example, engineers are now discovering the absence of sufficient bedrock foundation to support the construction of the main Pimental dam.”

The Terra Livre encampment comes at a time of heightening police crackdown on peaceful protests in Altamira, after President Lula’s June visit to inaugurate the Belo Monte dam ignited protests given that eight civil action lawsuits against the dam were still pending. Yet despite government intimidation, the encampment has forged on. “This is a critical moment for indigenous peoples from the Amazon Basin to affirm their opposition to Belo Monte, and other projects of its kind that represent an attack on their rights and the destruction of their lands. It is also crucial that we work together with our non-indigenous partners to confront this problem,” stated Marcos Apurinã, General Coordinator of COIAB.

The four-day meeting featured presentations by indigenous and grassroots leaders, experts, as well as human rights and environmental lawyers. At a press conference today at 14:00 in the São Sebastião room in the Altamira Cathedral, participants will present a declaration voicing their unified opposition to the Belo Monte dam and call for global solidarity in fighting this mega-dam as well as other similar projects in the Amazon. The event will be followed by a public rally in Altamira that will depart from the Altamira Cathedral at 15:30.

The declaration from this gathering will be brought to the National Terra Livre Encampment being held at Campo Grande, in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, from August 16-20, 2010.

Source

Also Indigenous Tribes Unite in Opposition to Belo Monte Dam

And Read the Declaration

All from International Rivers-Follow the links for contact details

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Mekong Dams Could Destabilize Region

By SIMON ROUGHNEEN for The Irrawaddy

BANGKOK––Uncoordinated decision-making and unilateral initiatives not only threaten the Mekong River area environment and livelihoods, but could affect security in Southeast Asia.

With four out eight Chinese dams already built on the Lancang, the name for the Upper Mekong River inside China, and nine more either in place or awaiting construction on the river’s middle and lower reaches in Cambodia and Laos, the jury is still out on how these dams will impact on the region. Environmental damage could also damage the economies in the region, in turn causing political strife within the affected countries and damaging the relations between countries.

According to Dr. Richard Cronin, the head of the Southeast Asia Program at the Stimson Center in Washington, DC, “fragmented decision-making and lack of co-ordination between stakeholders means that all sides are going ahead with their own projects without getting knowing how these work together or impact on the river and region as a whole.” Cronin was speaking at a seminar organized by the American Studies Programme at Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University.

According to Dr. Cronin, “the river is more fragile than we think, and it will take only a few dams for the river to be changed in ways we cannot fully understand.”

For example, environmental groups say that the Mekong catfish, the third-largest freshwater fish in the world, will be unable to spawn, as it will not be able to get upstream due to the dams.

Other critical voices such as Carl Middleton of International Rivers questioned the labeling of the dams as development projects, saying that they would undermine livelihoods for 60 million people who are dependent on the river.

Additional dams are likely to reduce fish stocks on the river, which is one the most lush waterways in the world. The prevention of silt from the Chinese or upper reaches from reaching the floodplains in southeast Asia could have unforeseen effects on farming and on the sustenance of the river delta.

China controls the upper reaches of the river, where most of the hydro-electric potential is located, much of which comes from melt water off snow-capped peaks, including from Tibet.

Chulalongkorn University academic Dr. Ukrit Pathmanand noted a potential for distrust and discord to emerge, if the changes to the river impact on livelihoods within the Mekong sub-region. “Non-traditional” security problems will fester, with disgruntled people losing fishery income or farmland due to changes in the river, thereby threatening social unrest.

However, Dr. Ukrit added that there are positives and negatives to dam construction––with additional hydropower to be weighed against potential damage caused to the environment and to livelihoods.

A four-country intergovernmental body called the Mekong River Commission aims to better-manage development along the waterway. The MRC had its first summit meeting in Hua Hin, Thailand, in April 2010. The body comprises Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam, but China and Burma have only accepted observer status. Pornlert Lattanan, the president of General Electric (Thailand), said that it is unlikely that Cambodia and Laos will raise the Mekong issue with Beijing, which has close relations with both.

This was seen at the MRC Summit, where Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen put the low waters in the Mekong region down purely to climate change, rather than Chinese dams. His Thai counterpart Abhisit Vejjajiva was more nuanced, saying that “this summit is sending a message that all countries in the Mekong Region, both its upper and lower parts, are stakeholders, and we all have to take joint responsibility for its long-term sustainability.” In June Thai officials went further, with Prasarn Maruekpithak, the representative at a MRC meeting in Vietnam, saying that “China’s four dams on the upper part of the Mekong River have already destroyed the river’s ecosystem. Now this giant nation plans to build 12 dams more on the lower part.”

Vietnam is concerned about the dams, some of which are planned for upstream in Cambodia and Laos. Speaking on June 29, Le Duc Trung, the director general of the Vietnam National Mekong Committee, is reported to have said, “Vietnam has…great concerns over the research results on the projects [the proposed dams], especially impacts on agriculture and fisheries likely caused by their dams’.

With the dam projects threatening to transform the river into a “series of lakes,” Dr. Cronin suggested that “a tipping point” looms for the Mekong, releasing a report and DVD to this effect recently.

“The impact on fisheries will be almost immediate,” if any more dams are built, he says. However a representative of a company involved in a project along the Mekong, Thanin Bumrungsap of the ITALIAN – THAI Development Public Company Ltd., said that he believed that the tipping point had already been reached, as it was unlikely that many of the proposed dam projects will be canceled.

[Ed-apols for full quote]

Source

Visit The Irrawaddy

Check out more on damming The Mekong at Mouth to Source here

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Battle to save South Africa’s ‘sacred sites’ from tourist chalets

The BBC

The Phiphidi Waterfalls are a majestic site hidden between thick trees and lush green vegetation in the far north of South Africa, near the border with Zimbabwe.

The falls are surrounded by large trees with roots that reach out over the water like arms raised in worship of the area considered sacred by the local Venda community.

But the area’s natural beauty means it is also a prime site to attract holiday-makers – and their money – to the impoverished region.

Yellow front-loader bulldozers have started to excavate the soil, preparing it for builders to lay the foundation for Limpopo’s first tourist complex which will include eight chalets, a bar and a restaurant at the head of the waterfall above the mountainous town of Thohoyandou.

News of the destruction of the holy place caused outrage amongst elders of the Ramunangi clan, who are widely accepted as the custodians of the waterfall.

The Ramunangi, a group within the Venda ethnic group, led by Tshavhungwe Nemarude, an 84-year-old woman, recently petitioned the Limpopo High Court to halt construction.

Their request was granted but only until later in August when the case is set to resume.

Ms Nemarude has accused Chief Jerry Tshivhase, from a different Venda clan, of ignoring the rights of the Ramunangi people to “protect the site”.

The Ramunangi say they were not consulted before the plans were drawn up and argue that building on sacred land is illegal.

“Surely there are other parts of Venda which can be developed which would actually benefit the local community and not harm it like disturbing the sacred sites will,” says Samuel Ramutangwe, a community member.

Moses Netshipale, the lawyer acting for Chief Tshivhase and the construction firm, was unavailable for comment despite numerous attempts to reach him.

Women of power

The sites are particularly important for the one million Venda people, as most still worship their ancestors. Christianity is also practised, but on a much smaller scale.

Different clans of the Venda have for centuries been tasked with performing certain rituals on behalf of the entire group. The Ramunangi are responsible for performing rain rituals and it is believed that only they can get the desired results from the gods.

These rituals are only done by women, known as Makhadzi – women of power. Men can be present, but only women speak to the ancestors during ceremonies.

One of the main rituals performed at the Phiphidi waterfall is Thevhula, a rain ritual considered essential to ensuring a good harvest and rains.

The Venda community believe famine, strife and disease will befall them if the sites are destroyed.

Now a desperate race against time has begun, with the Ramunangi joining forces with a local organisation called Dzomo la Mupo (Voice of the Earth), which fights against the desecration of sacred sites.

They are trying to garner support from other community leaders to present a united front against Chief Tshivhase.

“All the several sacred sites in Venda are interlinked. If one site is disturbed, it will affect all the other sites here,” says Mphatheleni Makaulule, founder of Dzomo la Mupo.

“The sites are our church and have been since recorded time,” she says.

Ms Makaulule recently won a scholarship to study at a number of institutions in the United States, including Harvard University.
map

She says she is disappointed that her local leaders have no regard for the upset this development would cause – not only to their cultural practices but also the region’s biodiversity.

The fertile foothills of the region’s Southpansberg mountains are home to hundreds of birds, plants and animal species.

Venda’s sacred sites include the degraded Lake Fundudzi, Thate Vonde Forest, Tshiendeulu Mountains and Nevhutanda Forest.

South Africa is legally obliged under the South African Heritage Resources Act and international law to protect biodiversity and community rights to sacred lands, cultural and spiritual practice and prior informed consent.

Tobacco prayer

Many of the plants found here are used by the community members for medicinal purposes.

The Ramunangi say they are not against economic development or tourism growth but that it should not happen on sacred land.

“Had we been consulted before the plans were put in place, we could have advised on suitable places to develop, we would not have been forced to go against the chief this way,” says community leader Phanuel Mudau, 52.

Chiefs and kings are held in great regard by South Africa’s traditional communities, especially the Venda. Dzomo la Mupo has been accused of great disrespect by starting a legal battle with a chief.

But the Ramunangi say the courts were their only hope.

“We have been trying for more than a year to meet with our leaders but our appointments with them always got cancelled,” said Mr Mudau.

“We resorted to writing to them even but still our concerns fell of deaf ears.”

Chief Phineus Nevhutanda, a custodian of the Nevhutanda Forest, said the fight to protect their sites may turn violent but believes the ancestors will shield them if this happens.

Before speaking to me, he sprinkles tobacco on the ground and says a short prayer, to inform the gods that he will be speaking on their behalf, he says.

“The people who are destroying these sites will be punished by the ancestors. It may not happen immediately but it will happen – they will be cursed for generations,” the 68 year old says angrily.

‘Defiled land’

Since the ruling, no-one has been allowed to enter the Phiphidi site, which was recently fenced off and turned into a park.

A sign at the gate where three guards have been stationed states that visitors must pay 5 rand ($0.7; £0.4) to enter the site – another bone of contention between the Ramunangi and Chief Tshivhase.

Used condoms, beer bottles and cans are strewn throughout the forest leading to the waterfall.

The Ramunangi blame this “defilement” of the site on Chief Tshivhase.

“We believe he opened the site up to the local community for recreational activities, knowing fully well that the site should not be open to the public. He knows Venda tradition – I don’t know why he is disrespecting the ways of our people like this,” said one Makhadzi.

The Ramunangi are supposed to perform a summer ritual in September to welcome the new season and pray for a good harvest but there are concerns this may not be possible.

If not, they fear ill-fortune looms for the entire Venda people.

[Ed-Apols for full quote]

Source

Visit The BBC

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

How water raises the political temperature between countries

By John Vidal, environment editor The Guardian

Water wars haven’t started yet, but shortages certainly cause tensions between states to rise

Fifteen years ago Ismail Serageldin, an Egyptian who was vice-president of the World Bank, shook politicians by predicting that the wars of the 21st century would be fought not over oil or land, but water.

So far he has been proved wrong, but escalating demand for water to grow food and provide drinking water for burgeoning urban populations has raised political tensions between many countries.

In Asia, there are disagreements over the right to dam shared rivers. India and Pakistan are in semi-permanent dispute over hydro-power on the river Indus. China, Nepal, India and Bangladesh all spar over the rivers rising in the Himalayas and which flow through neighbouring countries, providing water for nearly 500 million people on the way.

Tensions run high between Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan over the Amu Daria and Syr Daria rivers, as well as the severely depleted Aral Sea. Argentina and Uruguay have taken their dispute over the river Plate to the International Court of Justice in The Hague, while Mexico and the US argue over rights on the Rio Grande and Colorado.

Last month, Baghdad demanded that Syria cease pumping water from the Iraqi portion of the Tigris. Elsewhere in the Middle East, Palestine and Israel, and Iraq and Iran, row over water supplies from the Shatt al-Arab waterway and Turkey’s dams.

In Africa, the Chobe, a tributary of the Zambezi, has caused tension between Botswana, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe, while there have been incidents between Mauritania and Senegal over control of the Senegal. Shares of the Niger, Volta and Zambezi are all disputed.

According to the UN, there are more than 250 internationally shared rivers covering nearly half the total land surface of the earth, as well as innumerable shared aquifers. Around 300 potential conflicts around the world have been identified but history suggests very few if any are expected to develop into armed conflict. In the last century, only seven minor skirmishes over water were documented.

However, nearly all the world’s major rivers are expected to come under increased pressure to provide farming, industry and drinking water for the three billion extra people expected to be born before the world’s population starts to drop. By 2025, says the UN development programme, nearly one in three people will live in countries that are affected by water shortages. These already affect 450 million people in 29 countriesand, and according to the World Water Forum, tensions over water rights and allocations are expected to mount.

Last year the Pentagon predicted that water disputes would rise up the agenda in global politics in the coming years. It argued that water was central to border disputes. Conflicts in Chad, Yemen and Somalia, it said, have all been linked to water scarcity.

The disputes are not just between countries but between states and rural and urban users. The Yellow river in China, the Ganges, the Mekong and other Asian rivers do not always reach the sea in dry seasons, leaving farmers short and blaming factory users higher upstream.

The river Kaveri is the bone of serious contention between Tamil Nadu and neighbouring Karnatgaka states, and water from the Vansadhara river is disputed between Andrah Pradesh and Orissa states.

Ed-Apols for full quote

Source

Visit The Guardian Online

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF
Page 1 of 6:1 2 3 4 »Last »
start free
© 2010 Mouth to Source