logo
Already a member? Login here

sanitation´s archives ↓

Millions of Pakistani kids risk waterborne disease

By ASIF SHAHZAD for AP

PABBI, Pakistan — Five-year-old Shahid Khan struggled to remain conscious in his hospital bed as severe diarrhea threatened to kill him. His father watched helplessly, stricken at the thought of losing his son — one of the only things the floods had not already taken.

The young boy is one of millions of children who survived the floods that ravaged Pakistan over the last month but are now vulnerable to a second wave of death caused by waterborne disease, according to the United Nations.

Khan’s father, Ikramullah, fled Pabbi just before floods devastated the northwestern town about a month ago, abandoning his two-room house and all his possessions to save his wife and four children.

“I saved my kids. That was everything for me,” said Ikramullah, whose 6-year-old son, Waqar, has also battled severe diarrhea in recent days. “Now I see I’m losing them. We’re devastated.”

Ten other children lay in beds near Khan at the diarrhea treatment center run by the World Health Organization in Pabbi, two of whom were in critical condition.

Access to clean water has always been a problem in Pakistan, but the floods have made the situation much worse by breaking open sewer lines, filling wells with dirty water and displacing millions of people who have been forced to use the contaminated water around them.

The environment is especially dangerous for children, who are more vulnerable to diseases such as diarrhea and dysentery because they are more easily dehydrated. Many children in Pakistan also suffered from malnutrition before the floods hit, leaving them with weakened immune systems.

The Pakistani government and international aid groups have worked to get clean water to millions of people affected by the floods and treat those suffering from waterborne diseases. But they have been overwhelmed by the scale of the disaster, which has displaced a million more people in recent days.

The floods started in the northwest in late July after extremely heavy monsoon rains and surged south along the Indus River, killing more than 1,600 people, damaging or destroying more than 1.2 million homes and inundating one-fifth of the country — an area larger than England.

Some 3.5 million children are at imminent risk of waterborne disease and 72,000 are at high risk of death, according to the United Nations.
The World Health Organization set up the diarrhea treatment center in Pabbi about a week ago with the help of several other aid groups.

Workers have already treated more than 500 patients, mostly children, said Asadullah Khan, one of the doctors.

Some of the patients have been treated multiple times because broken sewer lines have contaminated the water in the town’s wells and pipes, said the doctor. “It is circulating the disease again and again,” he said.

The aid groups set up a similar treatment facility several days ago in Nowshera, a city adjacent to Pabbi that was also engulfed by the floods. Residents who have begun to return in recent days have encountered a scene of total destruction: caved-in houses and streets covered with mud and debris.

Most of the population lacks access to clean water, and mosquitoes have proliferated in stagnant floodwater around the city, raising the risk of malaria. Government help is nowhere to be found.

“It is trash, dirt, germs and odd smells everywhere,” said Zahid Ullah, whose 3-year-old and 10-year-old sons were being treated for gastroenteritis at the facility in Nowshera. “It is a big danger.”

Even at the hospitals where the diarrhea treatment centers have been set up, mobs of flies hovered around the patients despite attempts by staff to kill them.

The World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund appealed to the world on Saturday to provide water purification units, family hygiene kits and other items needed to increase access to clean water in Pakistan.

Guido Sabatinelli, the head of the World Health Organization in Pakistan, said the international community’s help was critical to help Pakistan avoid a second wave of death from waterborne disease.

“We are fearing the epidemic of disease,” said Sabatinelli. “Access to safer water, potable water” is critical, he said.

Asma Bibi couldn’t agree more. The young mother searched in vain for clean water on the outskirts of Nowshera as her feverish 2-month-old son, Ehtesham, sweltered in a tent set up for flood victims. They had run out of water the day before.

“My son is sick. He hasn’t breast-fed in two days,” she said. “He needs milk. He needs water.”

[Ed-Apols for full quote]

Source…On Google news

Visit AP

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

‘Water Water Everywhere and Not a Drop to Drink’

By SIMON ROUGHNEEN for The Irrawaddy

SUKKUR, Pakistan—On the road in from the airport, the water shimmered under the moonlight as men, women and children sat in the dark, near the would-be lake shore. During the day, in the nearby river, dolphins can usually be spotted.

Idyllic, you might think. However, this dusty and ramshackle town is at the front-line of one of the world’s worst humanitarian disasters in living memory.

Usually there is no water lapping at the roadside, and the only people there would be those out for an evening snack. Ramadan fast. But since torrential monsoon rain sent the Indus River spilling onto towns and farmland across Pakistan, an area the size of Italy has been deluged.

In downtown Sukkur, I spoke to Ashraf, who said he had left his family at the outskirts, before coming into town to buy some food.

“We managed to gather up some of our possessions before the waters came, but we did not have much warning. Our home is under water completely. I have enough money to feed my children for another couple of days, that is all.”

Like a few more flood victims I encountered, he had to pay three times the normal price for a bus to the city, as opportunists capitalize on people’s desperation to make a quick rupee.

Nature’s unwitting cruelty is followed, here and there, by man’s calculated greed. The last time a natural disaster hit this country, 80,000 people died in 13 seconds when an earthquake rocked Kashmir. This time, the death-toll is much lower and the disaster is unfolding slowly over many weeks. However, the impact is vast—running the entire 1,976 mile length of the Indus River from the mountainous north of Pakistan, where that 2005 quake hit, to these flood-prone plains in the south.

Everywhere, there are cases of diarrhea, cholera, skin diseases, as well as malaria and dengue—with mosquitoes proliferating amid the flood waters. Almost 5 million people now have no access to clean water, an irony seemingly lifted from Coleridge’s line “water water everywhere and not a drop to drink.”

Seventeen million acres of land are under water and, out of the mind-boggling 20 million people thought to be affected by the floods—around 800,000 people remain beyond the reach of aid workers or the Pakistani army, cut off by the rising waters that dissolved bridges and submerged roads.

This disaster is as vast as the swollen country-long lake that the Indus River has become, but the real human suffering and loss can be obscured by or sanitized into mere statistics—with people’s lives traduced by the actuary-level numbers required to account for such vast destruction.

The name Sukkur is derived from the Arabic word for intense, according to some historical accounts that date the place-name to Umayyad conquerors who marched east to this region over a millennium ago. For aid workers trying to help the displaced who are now—for want of a better word—flooding the town, the epithet seems apt.

Brian Casey worked at the forefront of relief operations in Haiti after the recent earthquake and in Burma after the 2008 Cyclone Nargis with the Irish NGO, GOAL. He said that the extent of the slowly unfurling crisis in Pakistan comes close to these massive disasters: “people are hungry, people are getting sick, and we don’t know yet how much worse things will get as the water rises in places. And at the same time, we have to think about how to help people rebuild homes and farms once the waters recede.”

Outside the city, Nizam Ud Din Bharchood of the Pakistani charity, Hands, takes me to a string of ad-hoc campsites along the highway. At one, around 30 women and children lolled under trees in the dust-infused 40-degree heat.

“Some of these people are here almost three weeks, without shelter, without regular food or water”, he said. “The men have gone into the city to see if they can get work somehow.”

Hands has been helping out with food and medicine since the start of the flood, and is partnering with GOAL to reach more people. Back to numbers again, and these are rising in tandem with the still-swelling waters, in an odd sort of danse macabre.

Four million Pakistanis are now homeless, and another 600,000 are threatened down-river in this southern region, meaning they might have to flee as well with two more weeks of monsoon rains expected.

Mohammed Ramza had less than a day to pack up with his family, and move, along with all his neighbors, to the roadside outside Sukkur.

“Our homes were destroyed, we managed only to save a few animals,” he said, pointing to a half-dozen goats sitting in the shade, their ears tugged by a trio of giggling children, none of whom are more than five years old.

Ignoring maternal admonitions to leave the animals alone, they compete to play up to the foreigner’s camera, some temporary respite from their still-unfinished ordeal.

Source

Visit The Irrawaddy

Irrawaddy correspondent Simon Roughneen is in Sindh, southern Pakistan. He can be reached via his website www.simonroughneen.com

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

EPA Releases Draft of Clean Water Strategy for Public Comment

Brett Walton for Circle of Blue

The EPA seeks stricter pollution standards and a national water quality assessment.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency released a draft version of its clean water strategy on Friday and is allowing public comments on the document through September 17.

The draft document, “Coming Together for Clean Water,” outlines a broad strategy for improving water quality. The EPA plans to strengthen water pollution regulations under the Clean Water Act and complete a comprehensive scientific assessment of the country’s water bodies.

Though it lacks quantitative targets, the document suggests stricter pollution standards pertaining to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and an expansion of stormwater discharge permits.

Other areas of focus include minimizing loss of aquatic life from cooling water intake structures, evaluating the effects of mining on water supplies, protecting rivers and lakes from invasive species as well as reducing sewer overflows. To gain a better baseline understanding of national water quality, the EPA will also complete a series of five Aquatic Resource Surveys in the next several years.

The Chesapeake Bay has been identified as an area of particular concern because of President Obama’s Executive Order calling on the federal government to lead the bay’s restoration effort. Possible actions include stronger total maximum daily load regulations, markets for water quality trading and regulations for reducing excess nutrient runoff.

The EPA also identifies the Great Lakes and the Gulf of Mexico as other water bodies of national significance and would like to apply a similar program in those areas.

Source

Visit Circle of Blue

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Floodwaters threaten city of half-million in Pakistan

CNN

Shahdadkot, Pakistan (CNN) — Shahdadkot’s half-million people frantically tried to flee their homes Saturday as a wall of water threatened to burst mud berms and drown the entire city in Pakistan’s Sindh province.

Three weeks into the worst natural disaster in Pakistan’s history, people were still desperate to escape as a second wave of monsoon floodwaters surged southward. More than 1,500 people have died and 20 million lives have been disrupted.

Already, huge parts of Shahdadkot look like a lake, with the roofs of some houses barely above water. Authorities advised the entire population to evacuate.

Residents climbed onto heaps of belongings piled high in the beds of rickety trucks, packed buses, auto-rickshaws and carts to get out of town before the water came. Many did not know where they were going — just that they had to reach drier ground.

But there weren’t enough vehicles for a mass evacuation.

Sunat Magsi and her 100-strong extended family lost their nine mud huts to the raging torrents. They sought shelter in an abandoned house, but even there the water was creeping higher. They only had one donkey and one cart left.

“We have so many children here,” Magsi said, weeping. “We don’t know how we’re going to get out. We need help.”

Read article…

Visit CNN

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

UN urges world to open wallets for Pakistan

AP

UNITED NATIONS — The United Nations is putting the spotlight on more than 20 million Pakistani flood victims and urging governments and people around the world to open their wallets to help.

At a hurriedly called meeting of the U.N. General Assembly on Thursday, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said donors have given half the $460 million the U.N. appealed for to provide food, shelter and clean water to flood victims over the next three months. But he said all the money is needed now — and much more will be needed to rebuild Pakistan.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that the United States, already the biggest donor, would contribute an additional $60 million, bringing its total to more than $150 million in response to Pakistan’s “worst natural disaster in its history.”

She said approximately $92 million will support the U.N.’s $460 million appeal, which aims to provide food, shelter and clean water to more than 6 million flood victims over the next three months.

Earlier, Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. special representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, said “many billions” would be needed to help Pakistan. He challenged other countries, especially Pakistan’s close ally China, to “step up to the plate.”

Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said the Chinese have increased their cash assistance, supplied relief goods and taken responsibility for providing food, water and shelter to some 27,000 people in an inaccessible area in the north “so if you put this all together, it’s substantial.”

Both Holbrooke and Qureshi spoke at the Asia Society in New York ahead of the U.N. meeting.

The U.N. wants to spotlight the enormity of the disaster, which is bigger than the 2004 Asian tsunami, the 2005 Pakistan earthquake, and this year’s Haiti earthquake, yet has attracted far less in donations.

Qureshi said Pakistan is facing one of its greatest challenges — tens of thousands of villages submerged, around 1,500 people killed, and more than 20 million affected — and needs international help because its own resources are insufficient.

“We’ve never seen anything like this before,” he said at the Asia Society, noting that only three weeks before the floods began Pakistan was trying to cope with a water shortage. “The economic cost is huge.”

Read article… on Google news

Visit AP

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Will Pakistan’s Floods Take Down the Economy and the President?

By OMAR WARAICH for Time

The flood waters took Ehsan Ali and his family by surprise. “At first we thought that the water wasn’t so serious,” says the farmer, 44, who worked on the rice fields that stretch across Shikarpur district. “Then they suddenly made an announcement in the mosques, telling us to run for our lives. A lot of water was coming.” As the water crept across the farms of Pakistan’s province of Sindh, drowning thousands of acres of crops, tens of thousands gathered whatever possessions they had and fled.

The evacuees now languish in makeshift shelters. Many have settled on the side of dirt roads, shading themselves from the blazing sun by propping a bed over their heads or sheltering beneath a wagon. Others are clustered under a tin awning by a derelict railway station, or in similarly run-down school buildings. Doctors say they are already seeing an outbreak of scabies and diarrhea among the displaced. Women have had to go into labor in public places, giving birth in classrooms they share with other families, for example. When relief goods arrive, always from a private donation, there is a panicked scramble to gather whatever little food each person can grab within the seconds available. With each passing day, the fury at the government’s neglect mounts.

It was in an attempt to stanch that anger that President Asif Ali Zardari paid a brief visit to Sindh, his native province, last week. Setting down via helicopter in Sukkur and under heavy guard, the leader glimpsed at the devastation, handed out checks to suffering children, stroking their heads to comfort them, and then returned to Islamabad. On Sunday, Zardari accompanied U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to southern Punjab, where Ban said: “This has been a heart-wrenching day for me … In the past, I have witnessed many natural disasters around the world, but nothing like this.” Before the floods, Zardari’s popularity stood at just 20%. Now it must be at rock bottom. Over the coming weeks, if he wishes to recover his government’s standing, he will have to set Pakistan on a course where it can begin to rebuild its economy, draw billions of dollars from the international community, and help the millions affected by the waters return to their lives. Many doubt whether their president is up to the task.

Last week, World Bank president Robert Zoellick said the floods have destroyed crops worth around $1 billion. By conservative Pakistani estimates, the figure is at least double. Some 17 million acres of agricultural land have been submerged, and more than 100,000 animals have perished. On the road to Rahimabad, the carcasses of buffalo lie on the side of the road, scavenged by wild dogs under clouds of flies. About a quarter of Pakistan’s economy and nearly a half of its workforce depend on agriculture.

Read article…

TIME | Northwest Pakistan Is Ravaged by Flooding – Photo Essay – here…

Visit Time

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Second wave of flooding threatens southern Pakistan

Chris Lawrence and Samson Desta for CNN

Islamabad, Pakistan (CNN) — A second wave of floodwater is expected to wash through southern Pakistan this weekend, adding hundreds of thousands of people to the number already stranded by a first wave earlier this month, Pakistani officials said.

At least 1,384 people have died and another 1,630 have been injured by flooding that has damaged or destroyed 8,300 Pakistani villages so far, according to National Disaster Management Authority spokesman Ahmed Kamal.

The United Nations said it was racing against time to reach the suffering.

“The death toll has so far been relatively low compared to other major natural disasters, and we want to keep it that way,” he said.

Two of 19 military helicopters pledged by the United States arrived in Islamabad, Pakistan, on Thursday to help in the humanitarian relief efforts, a U.S. Embassy spokesman said.

These aircraft replace six U.S. Army helicopters that will return to duty in Afghanistan, the embassy spokesman said. The Army helicopters rescued more than 3,000 people and delivered relief supplies since arriving in Pakistan on August 5, the spokesman said.

Farther north, more than 100 U.S. troops are on the ground in the volatile Swat valley, helping the Pakistani government deliver supplies and rescue people from flood-ravaged areas. None have yet encountered Taliban fighters.

“Obviously there’s a militant threat in this region, but the Pakistani military has done an incredibly committed job — providing us multiple layers of security around our units,” said U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Michael Nagata in a conference call from Pakistan. “All our activities and helicopters are completely safe.”

The bigger problem, said Nagata, is the weather. In the last two weeks, air crews have only been able to fly five days because of the relentless monsoon rains.

The initial wave of the flooding came after torrential rains two weeks ago filled rivers in northern Pakistan that swept southward. Weather experts said a year’s worth of rain fell in a day at the peak of the relentless downpours.

A second wave of floodwater from rain that fell in northern and central Pakistan the next week is now reaching the Sindh province in southern Pakistan, according to CNN meteorologist Brandon Miller.

An apparent bottleneck of water from the first flood wave at the Sukkar dam could be overtaken by the second wave, Miller said.

“This could lead to a situation where the two flood waves could build upon each other and lead to even more catastrophic flooding,” Miller said.

Pakistan emergency officials predicted the second wave could reach Sukkar on Saturday evening.

Hundreds of thousands of people living along the Indus River in northern Sindh could be stranded along with the tens of thousands stranded by the first wave, said Pakistani Navy Lt. Commander Jawad Khawaja.

Many residents have ignored government warnings to evacuate the area, causing a big concern, Khawaja said.

More than 14 million Pakistanis are affected, with 400,000 rescued from floodwaters, the government said. It estimated that 723,950 homes have been damaged or destroyed.

In the mountainous north, water funneled down treacherous slopes, quickly engulfing the roads below. It surged down the Indus River, spreading economic, political and social woes through the heart of Pakistan.

The smell of bodies filled the air in many places, where mere seconds of unstoppable water ended lives. Many witnesses, even those who thought they had seen everything in this land marred by crisis and killing, said they were stunned by the suffering wrought by the monsoons.

U.S. President Barack Obama, in a statement marking the 63rd anniversary of Pakistan’s independence on Friday, said, “We will remain committed to helping Pakistan and will work side by side with you and the international community toward a recovery that brings back the dynamic vitality of your nation.”

Source

Additional video coverage of the image of the floods from Dan Rivers here… No end in sight to Pakistan floods

Visit CNN

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Journal of Water and Climate Change

Journal of Water and Climate Change from IWA

Volume 1 Number 1

Contents

Water and climate change: challenges for the 21st century

Justin D. Brookes, Charles M. Ainger, Carol Howe, John W. Norton and Geoffrey Schladow.

Securing 2020 vision for 2030: climate change and ensuring resilience in water and sanitation services

Guy Howard, Katrina Charles, Kathy Pond, Anca Brookshaw, Rifat Hossain and Jamie Bartram.

Future challenges to asset investment in the UK water industry: the wastewater asset investment risk mitigation offered by minimising principal operating cost risks

S. J. Palmer.

Modeling river discharge rates in California watersheds

Christopher Potter, John Shupe, Peggy Gross, Vanessa Genovese and Steven Klooster.

Temperature effects on bank filtration: redox conditions and physical-chemical parameters of pore water at Lake Tegel, Berlin, Germany

A. Gross-Wittke, G. Gunkel and A. Hoffmann.

Modelling climate change impacts on the flood pulse in the Lower Mekong floodplains

K. Västilä, M. Kummu, C. Sangmanee and S. Chinvanno.

Water, livelihoods and climate change adaptation in the Tonle Sap Lake area, Cambodia: learning from the past to understand the future

Paula Nuorteva, Marko Keskinen and Olli Varis.

Abstracts and PDF’s here…

Save The Mekong Coalition have published ‘Modelling Climate Change Impacts on the Flood Pulse in the Lower Mekong Floodplains’ here

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

The Water Pollution Challenge is Tackleable

Lost in translation. I couldn’t find an instance of ‘tackeable’ in the dictionary but the substance of the post is right on it.

By Brenda Sorensen and published on IDN-InDepth NewsAnalysis

STOCKHOLM (IDN) – Whether rich or poor, people in every corner of the world are confronted with the pressing challenge of water pollution. Some two million tonnes of human waste are disposed of in watercourses everyday. Seventy percent of industrial wastes in developing countries are dumped untreated into waters where they pollute the usable water supply.

The complexity of the challenge of water pollution lies in the many different forms that pollution can take. These are the range of pollution sources, and the varying scales — local, regional or global — at which pollution can develop.

Lack of monitoring and enforcement also makes it difficult for countries and regions to understand and deal with this challenge. Lest it should appear that there is no hope, the paper adds: As with most challenges, however, opportunities exist that can reverse the water degradation trend, contribute to economic growth and improve human and environmental health.

One way to prevent and mitigate pollution is the ‘Polluter Pays Principle’, which asks the polluter to pay for the pollution mitigation, thereby transferring the costs to those that are responsible, and in turn stimulating new innovative solutions.

Another method is ‘Name and Shame’, where those that are found to be polluting water systems are publically singled out, with the aim to deter future recurrences.

The 2010 World Water Week (WWW) from September 5 to 11 in Stockholm will explore: What other strategies exist to prevent and mitigate pollution? What institutional obstacles exist that may inhibit the implementation of pollution policies?

On the anvil is also a role for media and the general public in facilitating decisions at all levels of government and society.

The basic challenge, according to the thematic paper posted on the web, lies in the fact that demographic change and economic growth contribute to water being increasingly withdrawn, used, reused, treated, and disposed of. Urbanisation, agriculture, industry and climate change exert mounting pressure on both the quantity and quality of water resources.

The reason: many human activities that produce a good also generate pollutants. In fact, every human may be seen as a source of pollutants. These pollutants often find their way into sinks such as reservoirs, wetlands and aquifers.

Within the context of global changes, WWW will highlight the more sobering aspects of the challenge: the pollution-causing activities, the prevalent and emerging pollutants, and the scale and trends of the impacts on human and environmental health.

URGENCY

This will help to clarify the current status and convey the urgency, magnitude and pervasiveness of the water quality problem.

The WWW will also investigate how some countries and regions have responded to water quality degradation in the past. This is expected to shed light on how to circumvent historical trends as the world moves forward.

“Learning from the association between development and water quality degradation in the past can help to prevent patterns from re-occurring as countries develop. By learning from what has worked and not worked, we can avoid a business-as-usual approach that would delay even further the recovery of ecosystems and lead potentially to irreversible shifts,” argues the paper.

The Week will also provide an opportunity to examine promising examples, case studies and leading-edge technologies that are in use around the world. This will draw attention to effective response measures related to pollution prevention, wise resource use and sound abatement practices, thus allowing for an analysis of the alternatives to improve the current and future water quality problems.

An important point in confronting the challenge of water pollution is that to realize that water is a solvent and transport mechanism continuously moving through the landscape. Human modifications of water systems and changes in land use have significant effects on surface and groundwater quality, which in turn has negative effects on human and ecosystem health.

In the absence of this awareness, there is often a disconnect for people that pollute and the effects of that pollution on people and ecosystems downstream or in other parts of shared lakes and aquifers. “The flow perspective can therefore shed light on the creeping and often invisible nature of water pollution,” states the paper.

It is also vital to realize that accumulation of pollutants over time in the natural sinks in the landscape can have considerable long term impacts on human and ecosystem health. Groundwater systems are especially vulnerable to pollution, as they are often difficult and costly to remediate. Some pollutants can occur in high concentrations even though the water can appear clean and safe.

Intensified resource use in all sectors is generally associated with increased loads of nutrients, sediments, chemicals, pathogens and metals. Tracing the pathways of these pollutants, from rain to drain, can in fact help to shed light on many issues, including how pollution can contribute to the undermining of ecosystem resilience.

Weakened resilience diminishes the capacity of ecosystems to cope, leading to tipping points and regime shifts. Sometimes these shifts are irreversible and the goods and services that humans derived from the ecosystems are lost.

According to the paper, for analytical reasons and effective policy-making, it is useful to distinguish between point and non-point sources of pollution. Point sources include pipelines, channels and drains from identifiable locations such as an industrial plant or landfill.

Non-point or diffuse sources of pollution arise from extensive land areas and are mobilised by precipitation and thus closely related to the hydrological cycle.

Agricultural and urban runoff and air borne particulates are examples of diffuse sources, and their entry points to receiving waters are often difficult to identify. Diffuse pollution sources are significant due to their far reaching geographical and temporal effects and the difficulty to contain them once they are in the water systems.

“For non-point pollution in particular, prevention is the most effective measure. Harmful production, consumption and disposal practices need to be monitored, controlled, and where possible prohibited, to prevent hazardous substances from reaching water bodies and impacting human and ecosystem health,” the paper advises.

[End]

Source

Visit IDN-InDepth NewsAnalysis

I couldn’t find a direct link to the report but if you are going to Stockholm between the 5th and 11th of September for World Water Week here’s a link to the event finder and be sure to let everybody know about Mouth to Source.

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

‘Floating wetlands’ find a home in Baltimore’s Inner Harbor

By Jamie Smith Hopkins for The Baltimore Sun

Waterfront advocates hope project improves water quality

Baltimore’s Inner Harbor was once ringed by wetlands, but over time they gave way to development until only one was left.

Now there are two.

Volunteers in kayaks, a small boat and a canoe towed a “floating wetland island” from Fells Point — where it took form — to the waters alongside Baltimore’s World Trade Center on Sunday. Tourists stopped to gawk and snap photographs as the environmentally friendly flotilla made its slow way along the harbor, the cargo more eye-catching in its greenery than anything else in the crowded waterway.

The Waterfront Partnership, a nonprofit that maintains and promotes the Inner Harbor area, installed the 200-square-foot wetlands as one small part of an ambitious goal to make the polluted harbor swimmable and fishable in 10 years.

“It’s going to take all of us rolling in the same direction, but we believe it is possible,” said Laurie Schwartz, executive director of the partnership.

It took a lot of people just to create the floating wetlands, which will soak up pollutants, produce the oxygen that’s critical for healthy water and provide a place for crabs and other aquatic critters to live.

The Baltimore Harbor Waterkeeper, a water-quality watchdog group, paid the $50,000 cost from an air-pollution settlement fund. Biohabitats, a Baltimore-based ecological restoration firm, designed the wetlands — 11 separate rectangular structures made of plastic bottles plucked from the harbor, mesh and wood. Then, students with the Living Classrooms Foundation in Fells Point built the structures and planted them with marsh grass and flowers.

For weeks, the manmade wetlands floated beside the one other example left alongside the harbor — Living Classrooms’ own marsh. Sunday morning, they headed off by boat and kayak to their permanent destination in tourist-heavy waters.

Read article…

Visit The Baltimore Sun

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF
Page 1 of 5:1 2 3 4 »Last »
start free
© 2010 Mouth to Source