Proposed Dam a Mystery, Concern to Kratie Locals

Sophat Soeung, VOA Khmer | Kratie Province, Cambodia

Later this month, a major report assessing the pros and cons of 11 proposed mainstream hydro-dams in the lower Mekong region will be publicised by the Mekong River Commission. The report will include information about two hydro-dams across the Mekong River in Kratie and Stung Treng provinces.

Although no decision has been made by the Cambodian government on the proposals, local people know little about the plans and are concerned their voices will be left out.

Sours Ve, a 38-year-old farmer and guest house operator in Sambor district, is among them. On a recent morning, she said goodbye to a group of tourists from the US, who had staid with her under a home stay system. The community-based tourism project has boosted her annual income, but she says she’s worried she’ll lose her home if a dam is built across the river here.

In 2007, a Chinese survey team arrived at her house and placed a concrete marker on her property. Were the megadam to go forward, it will fall directly across her property, creating behind it a 86-kilometer-long reservoir.

“I asked them what they were surveying, and they told me that they were going to build a hydrodam, and they put in this post on my land,” she said, standing over the marker behind her wooden stilt house after the tourists had gone.

“We learned that this was a study by a hydrodam construction company, but whether they will build the dam or not, we don’t know,” she said. “And our people started to worry, not knowing when the dam will be built.”

Government officials say it is premature for anyone to worry about a dam here. They say the 18-kilometer dam that has been proposed for Sambor is only one of several options they will discuss in coming meetings.

The proposed dam, currently being studied by China Southern Power Grid, is one of 11 dams being considered by lower Mekong countries Cambodia, Laos and Thailand. Experts say these dams can be more problematic than their upper Mekong cousins, because down here, the land is flat, which require giant dams and reservoirs.

Critics say the dams will do more than put people like Sours Ve off their land. They can also be damaging to fisheries and the river’s ecology. In Sambor district, there is little information, but plenty of concern.

“We heard rumors that if it is built, it will be massive, and 56 meters tall,” said Sours Ve, who recently traveled to Phnom Penh to learn more about the project and to Ratanakkiri province to see the effects of a Vietnamese dam on the Sesan river.
She is among the most informed people in her community.

“We know that if the project goes ahead, we’ll have to relocate,” she said. “And we locals became worried because we don’t know when they’ll come, and no one can give us an answer.”

Ith Praing, a secretary of state for the Ministry of Industry, Mines and Energy, said concerns like these are so far unfounded. Sambor’s potential for a dam has been studied since at least 1964, he said, so this is only the latest study.

“And up until now we haven’t made any decision on the proposal, pending [a more comprehensive] study, to decide whether there is really hydropower potential and what the [negative] impacts are,” he said.

Kratie Governor Kham Khoeun told VOA Khmer he was aware of the study, but not the extent of it. He agreed that concerns right now are premature because studies on ongoing.

At the Sambor district fish market, which according to maps would sit just below the proposed megadam, little is known about the study.

A 33-year-old fish monger who gave her name as Adik said she’d never heard of it. Nearby, 54-year-old vendor Nhoung Sokkhim said she’d seen the Chinese during the field study in 2007, but knew little more.

“I saw the Chinese come with their machines, but I haven’t seen any construction,” she said. “I only saw them bringing metallic devices further up near the pagoda. There was no explanation of what is going on. No one knows, not even the local authorities.”

Indeed, Sambor District Chief Heng Sotha told VOA Khmer all he knew about the proposal came from local people.
“I am unaware of the details of the plan,” he said. “There are no official documents informing me about this.”

Ith Praing said there was no need to worry that people’s input would not be part of the decision. The government plans to take the proposal’s negative impacts very seriously, he said, adding that local authorities have in the past been invited to Phnom Penh to discuss the dam.

As proposed, according to a draft report of the Mekong River Commission, the Sambor hydrodam would flood 620 square kilometers, including 3,369 hectares of agricultural land and be operational by 2020.

For Sours Ve, the trade-off won’t be worth it.

“These days, we no longer want electricity if it means having to relocate,” she said. “It’s possible for us to move, but what about the bones of our ancestors? They’ll be flooded, and nothing will remain.”

Source

Visit VOA

Malaysian firm to build dam on Mekong tributary

DPA by way of Monsters & Critics

Vientiane, Laos – A Malaysian firm has been granted permission to build a 130-megawatt dam in north-western Laos on a tributary of the Mekong River, state media reports said Monday.

Malaysia’s Asia Pacific Business Lin Snd Bhd Co Ltd (AP Bizlink) last week signed an agreement with Laos’ Ministry of Planning and Investment to construct the dam in Luang Namtha and Bokeo provinces over the next four years, the Vientiane Times reported.

The 145-metre-tall dam would create a 2,825-square-kilometre catchment area on the Nam Pha River, a tributary of the Mekong, South-East Asia’s longest waterway, which passes through southern China, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam.

AP Bizlink chairman Zakaria bin Dato Ahmad said the project would contribute to meeting the electricity demands of northern Laos and attract foreign investment to the area.

No details were provided on the cost of the dam nor the Malaysian firm’s plans for conducting a social-environmental impact study on the project area or on the Mekong.

China has already built four large hydroelectric dams on the upper Mekong, but none have yet been built on the South-East Asian segments of the river.

The Mekong River Commission – of which Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam are members – has warned that all dams on the middle and lower Mekong River would have an adverse impact on fisheries, which provide an estimated 2 billion dollars each year in revenues for people living off the river.

‘Current fish passage technology would not be effective in maintaining the migration of the large number and diverse fish species found in the Mekong,’ the commission concluded in a study conducted by a group of scientists in 2008.

‘In view of this conclusion and the assessment of the value of the Mekong’s fisheries, the group concluded that dams on the mainstream in the middle and lower part of the Mekong will have a major impact on the fisheries and serious economic and social implications,’ the commission warned.

Less research has been done on the impact of dams on tributaries of the Mekong. Communist Laos, which has said it aspires to be the ‘battery of South-East Asia,’ plans to build about 20 hydropower plants on its rivers by 2020.

A mountainous country rich in water resources, Laos currently has 14 hydropower plants with a combined capacity of 2,540 megawatts, much of which is exported to neighbouring Thailand.

Source on Monsters & Critics

Visit Monsters & Critics

Visit DPA (in English)

Impact study for 12 Mekong dams

By Hoang Nam for Viet Nam News

HCM CITY — International experts and multi-stakeholders met in HCM City yesterday for the final workshop on the environmental and social impacts of 12 proposed hydropower dams on the mainstream lower Mekong.

About 100 participants from six Mekong countries attended the “Avoidance, mitigation and enhancement” workshop that is part of the “Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA) of Proposed Mainstream Hydropower Dams in the Lower Mekong” study. It is the fourth and final workshop of the series.

“Mekong River is famous for its huge potential of hydropower development, 59,900MW basin-wide and 30,900MW in the Lower Mekong Basin (LMB),” Dr Le Duc Trung director general of the Viet Nam National Mekong Committee told workshop in his opening speech.

“However, negative impacts from hydropower construction on the river-dependent ecosystem and livelihoods of millions of people should be estimated,” Trung said.

Private sector developers will build the 12 mainstream Mekong hydropower dams that are planned for Thailand, Cambodia and Lao under respective government MOUs.

The 1995 Mekong Agreement, signed by Cambodia, Lao, Thailand and Viet Nam, requires that such projects are discussed extensively among all four countries prior to any decision being taken.

The year-long study has researched impacts on regional energy planning; people; fisheries and barrier effects of dams on fish migration; maintenance of ecological integrity and biodiversity; river morphology and sediment balance; and water quality and salinity intrusion.

The two-day workshop aims to avoid or mitigate risks and enhance the benefits of the dams.

Read article…

Visit Viet Nam News

US raps on Asian shrimpers’ doors after oil spill

By MARGIE MASON for The Associated Press

HANOI, Vietnam — As the Gulf Coast oil spill continues to gush, U.S. seafood suppliers are turning to Asia to ensure Americans have enough shrimp for their gumbos, Creoles and cocktails this summer, but some of those overseas cupboards are low themselves.

Several countries in the world’s top shrimp-producing region are struggling to satisfy their own appetites for shrimp because of disease, drought and the economic crisis. The oil spill is one more factor driving prices skyward, sending a worldwide ripple through an already tight shrimp market.

The price of plump black tiger shrimp is at a 10-year high in Vietnam, selling for around $13.50 per kilogram ($6.14 per pound), said Bui Dung, a manager at Minh Phu, Vietnam’s biggest shrimp exporter in the southern Mekong delta province of Ca Mau. He said heat waves along with disease outbreaks have led to smaller yields on farms. Domestic consumption has remained high, nibbling away at cold stocks normally available for export prior to August harvests.

“The demand, particularly from the U.S., is huge,” Dung said. “We receive order requests from U.S. importers almost everyday, but we cannot meet all their demands.”

Americans have an insatiable craving for shrimp, eating about 4 pounds (1.8 kilograms) a year. And while wild Gulf shrimp provides only about 7 to 9 percent of that supply, the oil spill will likely send some U.S. restaurants and super markets into a short-term frenzy, said Fatima Ferdouse, chief of trade promotion at Infofish, an intergovernmental organization for the Asia-Pacific fishery industry based in Malaysia.

“It backfired because in the American market, they planned to sell … this much domestic shrimp from the Gulf for summer, which they’re not getting now,” she said by phone. “So they have to fill in the gap. They panic and then the easy way to get it is to go through import — they don’t have any other choice.”

According to Infofish, wholesale shrimp prices have risen by about 15 to 20 percent since a BP-operated oil rig exploded 10 weeks ago, causing an undersea blowout that has spewed millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf.

Read article…On Google news

Visit AP

Dams portend grim future for Mekong Delta: experts

ThanhNien News

Critics slam China’s hegemonic behavior in the Greater Mekong Sub-region

Upstream and lower dams could render the Mekong Delta unviable, and China’s intransigence in building them and refusing to share information about their operations will negatively impact the lives of more than 60 million people.

“China has plans to construct up to eight dams in total, some sources say the number could rise to fourteen. It is clear already that Chinese dam construction is having a negative impact on downstream states,” Professor Carlyle Thayer of the Australian Defense Force Academy told Thanh Nien Weekly.

“The ecology of the river system downstream has had wide-ranging effects. Dams prevent the downward flow of alluvium which fertilizes the Mekong Delta in Vietnam. Dam construction interferes with the migration of spawning fish. The impact on fisheries reduces the amount of fish and therefore protein that feeds the people in the Lower Mekong,” he said.

The Mekong originates in the Tibetan plateau and flows 4,800 km (2,980 miles) through rice-rich areas of Myanmar, Thailand, Laos and Cambodia before emptying into the East Sea off Vietnam.

Read article…

Visit ThanhNien News

Nam Theun 2: Risky Business

[youtube width="598" height="482"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qj5rHofPFGo[/youtube]

This video is about Laos’ largest and most controversial hydropower project, Nam Theun 2. Risky Business describes how Nam Theun 2 is affecting Lao villagers’ everyday life, including interviews with the affected communities. The video is produced by BankTrack and International Rivers based on a site visit in May 2009.

MORE INFORMATION:

Visit International Rivers’ Nam Theun 2 campaign page
Visit BankTrack’s Nam Theun 2 Dodgy Deal

CONTACT US:

Ikuko Matsumoto
[email protected]
+1 510-848-1155

Source

Drought brings severe hardship to riverside communities, demonstrates need for regional cooperation to protect Mekong River

Save The Mekong

March 14, is the International Day of Action for Rivers. As the Mekong suffers its worst drought in decades, painfully demonstrating the importance of the river to the region’s people, and revived plans to build dams on the mainstream threaten the river’s ecology and resources, this is a day to reflect upon the life-giving benefits that rivers provide, and to take action to protect the Mekong River for present and future generations.

Severe Drought

The Mekong River is facing an increasingly severe drought that holds serious implications for river-side communities and the wider population of the Mekong region. To date, the people of Yunnan Province of China, Eastern Shan State of Burma, North and Northeastern Thailand and Northern Lao have especially suffered. Fish catch has declined, water for irrigated agriculture, livestock and drinking has become scarce, and river transportation has been grounded, affecting trade and tourism.

The loss of fisheries, crops, livestock and drinking water has struck the livelihoods, food security and economies of some of the region’s poorest communities. In the context of the ongoing global economic crisis, these communities have few alternative means to see them through this disaster.

There is a high likelihood of far wider impacts throughout the Mekong basin, as the river is usually at its lowest in April and May. In Laos, river-side communities are already reporting scarcity of fish and lack of water for dry season, river bank horticulture. In Cambodia, the drought threatens the massive fisheries productivity of the Tonle Sap Lake, where the total fish catch each year is proportional to the extent of flooding, and is central to Cambodia’s food security and economy. In the Mekong delta in Vietnam, where over 10 million farmers and fishers live, saltwater intrusion threatens the farming and fisheries and has been reported in some places to have already extended nearly 60 kilometers in land, which is double the usual extent.

Mekong River Commission: Negligence

The Mekong River Commission (MRC) issued a statement on the drought on 26 February 2010, over two weeks after the media began reporting the severity of the situation. The statement attributes the exceptionally low Mekong River water-levels to a “drier than normal” wet season in 2009 combined with “a consistent pattern of monthly precipitation significantly below average amounts since September 2009” in Yunnan Province China, Northern Thailand and Northern Laos.

Given these apparently clear indicators foreshadowing the severity of the drought, available since at least September 2009, and that the MRC Secretariat is charged with monitoring this data, the MRC Secretariat’s failure to warn the public and instigate precautionary actions amounts to a serious negligence on its part.

This situation mirrors the earlier failure of the MRC Secretariat in August 2008 to warn with sufficient notice communities in Northern Thailand and Northern Laos whose livelihoods were devastated by the flooding. This failure was widely criticized by communities and NGOs at the time, and the recurrent situation indicates serious systemic incompetence within the MRC.

The Save the Mekong coalition remains disappointed over the MRC Secretariat’s poor record on transparency, access to data and belated action, now for the drought conditions as well as on the proposed Mekong mainstream dams, and calls for a public review of the MRC Secretariat’s performance.

China’s dams

The MRC has sought to exonerate China’s dams on the Mekong River’s upper mainstream (Lancang) from the severity of the drought in its reports and through the media. The MRC has taken this position despite the fact that neither China nor the MRC have publicly released data supporting this position. China began filling the reservoir of the Xiaowan Dam – the world’s highest arch dam and the fourth built on the Lancang – in October 2009. This timing, and the subsequent drop in downstream flows, coincides with the MRC’s identified onset of the drought.

It is not surprising that communities in downstream countries are suspicious of the Lancang dams’ contribution to the current drought. Changes to the Mekong River’s daily hydrology and sediment load since the early 1990s have already been linked to the operation of the Lancang dam cascade by academics. As a result, communities downstream in Northern Thailand, Burma and Laos have suffered loss of fish and aquatic plant resources impacting local economies and livelihoods. These dams in China have been built without consultation, apology, disclosure of data, compensation or restitution, all of which are now long overdue.

The first turbine of the Manwan dam – the first dam built on the Lancang – came online in 1992, coinciding with the 1992-1993 Mekong drought. Construction of the second Lancang dam was completed in October 2003, coinciding with the 2003-2004 drought. Construction of the third dam, Jinghong, was completed in late 2008. The Xiaowan Dam, presently filling its reservoir, has a reservoir capacity approximately five times larger than that of the combined storage of these three earlier dams.

The role that these dams played in earlier droughts has never been clarified or communicated; instead the facts have often been muddied. The Thai National Mekong Committee, for example, in a report this year on the drought identified the Manwan Dam to have started operation in 1994, rather than 1992, thus masking the potential implications of the dam during the 1992-3 drought.

The extreme suffering of the drought-stricken farmers in Yunnan province, China, is shared by fishers and farmers in Thailand and Laos. The Save the Mekong Coalition therefore makes a direct appeal to the Chinese Government to equitably share the remaining water resources between countries to alleviate to the extent possible the suffering of all river-dependent communities.

On 10 March 2010, the Bangkok Post reported that Chinese officials have invited the lower Mekong country governments to visit the Jinghong dam to inspect the water levels. In addition, the Chinese Embassy in Bangkok held a press conference on March 11 to state their position on the situation. The Save the Mekong Coalition welcomes these gestures of increasing transparency and disclosure.

The easiest and most accountable way for China to build trust with downstream communities and demonstrate that its dams are not compounding the impacts of the current drought would be to invite representatives of civil society as observers to the inspection trip to Jinghong, and to extend the trip to all four Lancang dam projects. Disclosure of all the data regarding rainfall, river and reservoir water-levels, and dam operation since the mid-1980s, when dam construction started, together with subsequent regular public reporting on dam operation and water levels, would build further trust with downstream neighbors. This should lead to negotiation with downstream countries over reparation for the project’s existing impacts and restitution to minimize future impacts.

Mekong Mainstream Dams: Threat to Ecosystems, Livelihoods and Food Security

In addition to plans for up to fifteen dams on the Lancang (upper Mekong) mainstream in China, the Mekong River is threatened by plans for eleven hydropower dams on the lower mainstream in Cambodia, Laos and Thailand which, if built, would have severe consequences on a regional scale. By blocking the river’s massive fish migrations, building these dams would place at risk the millions of people who depend upon the Mekong for their income, livelihood and food security. Experience around the world demonstrates that there is no way of mitigating such large dams’ impacts on fisheries. The Save the Mekong Coalition has consistently called for all actors to protect the Mekong River for present and future generations. We emphasize the importance of the river for the food security of millions of people throughout the region. Conveying this message, in October 2009, a 23,110 signature petition was sent to the Prime Ministers of Cambodia, Lao, Thailand and Vietnam. The petition was also sent to the Chairpersons of the National Mekong Committees (NMCs) of Cambodia, Lao, Thailand and Vietnam calling for a strong and trusted consultative process at the national and local level on development options for the Mekong River, which guarantees the participation of all riparian communities.

The present severe drought and the extreme floods of 2008 testify to the dynamic nature of the river, but also to its seasonal variation and the need for a far more cautious approach to human intervention in the river’s future. More dams are not the solution to a warming world. The Save the Mekong Coalition is very concerned about recent announcements by the Thai government that has sought to justify dam construction to fix the drought, including the Ban Koum and Pak Chom mainstream dams. Building dams on the Lancang-Mekong River’s mainstream will further undermine the river’s resilience. The Save the Mekong Coalition calls for a better approach that sustainably meets energy needs whilst at the same time protecting the region’s rivers.

Urgent Regional Cooperative Action Required

The severe drought highlights once again the importance of the Mekong River and its resources to all riparian communities that live along it, as well as the wider Mekong basin population.

Cooperation under the MRC has failed to ensure a coordinated and preemptive response to the drought. Under these exceptional circumstances, it is critical that the Mekong region’s governments, including China, proactively work together to share information and forge a cooperative response to work with riverside communities along the entire length of the river to minimize the drought’s economic, social and environmental costs.

For more information, please contact:

Pianporn Deetes, Living River Siam, Tel. +66 (0) 81-422-0111;
email: [email protected] ; www.livingriversiam.org

Montree Chantavong, Towards Ecological Recovery and Regional Alliance (TERRA)
Tel. +66 (0) 81-950-0560; email: [email protected] ; www.terraper.org

Carl Middleton, International Rivers, Tel: +66 (0) 84-6815332;
email: [email protected]; www.internationalrivers.org

The Save the Mekong coalition is a network of non-government organizations, community groups, academics, journalists, artists, fishers, farmers and ordinary people from within the Mekong countries and internationally. For more information on the coalition and the impacts of the planned Mekong mainstream dams in English and regional languages, please visit: www.SavetheMekong.org.

Government Power Policy should be rethought, report says

From The Cambodia Daily and published via Probe International

“I think we need to question how big institutions like the ADB and World Bank can support decentralization” in Cambodia, he said.

NGO Forum Director Chhit Sam Ath said: “We organized this workshop to give attention to alternative, decentralized power that has less impact [than hydropower] on the environment and rivers, and Cambodian people.”

“The government needs to explore the option.”

Many argue that hydropower projects planned for Cambodian rivers risk wiping out fisheries and the livelihood of local communities as water flow and water quality is negatively affected and fish are prevented from migrating downstream.

Asked if energy technology such as solar systems or biomass power generation could substitute the huge amount of electricity generated by hydropower projects, Mr. Sam Ath said: “It’s important to think: Why do we need the power? Only for Cambodian people themselves or to export to other countries?”

Read article…

Visit Probe International

Power and Responsibility

Monitoring development in the Mekong

Oxfam Australia and the Australian Mekong Resource Centre at the University of Sydney have released a report, Power and Responsibility, which examines the role, responsibility and effectiveness of the Mekong River Commission in informing debate or addressing concerns around controversial proposals to dam the Mekong River mainstream.

The report outlines that the MRC’s own research shows that the proposed dams present serious threats to the Mekong’s ecology, fisheries and food security – the lifelines for many of the Mekong’s communities. It also raises questions as to whether the MRC is fulfilling its mandate to ensure the region is sustainably developed, by acting on its own research and analysis. And it considers whether the MRC is seen as responsive to the needs of the wider basin community.

The full report, including executive summary translations in Thai, Khmer, Lao, Vietnamese and Chinese can be downloaded from this page on the Oxfam Australia website.

Here’s a direct link for the english version of Power and Responsibility

The Mekong River: How much more can it safely yield?

Jeremy Bird, CEO of The Mekong River Commission writes a special report for The Nation in Bangkok and publishes this in the midst of a regional meeting of stakeholders in Chang Rai, Thailand.

Although not providing any particular answers it does suggest a framework of what questions we should be asking with regards to the viability and sustainability one of the most important watersheds on the planet.

Much can be gained economically by Basin governments in the Lower Mekong. Besides fisheries, hydropower is a renewable energy source and has the potential to generate large amounts of revenue for governments to use in social development programmes; the Mekong agricultural industry is worth billions and there is much potential for increasing water storage and irrigation systems; and the Mekong and its tributaries are vital links for transport and commerce in the region.

However, there are also challenges associated with population growth and climate change. Similarly, if basic livelihoods are to continue to be met by water resources of the Basin, future developments need to be planned carefully. The rural poor should naturally also benefit in the long-term from economic growth underpinned by any larger-scale development of water resources. But this can be achieved only through strategies that make use of targeted benefit- sharing mechanisms.

What is needed is an integrated analytical approach that examines the distribution of benefits, costs and the effects of development on the river system. What, for example, would be the economic and social benefits of a hydropower scheme, compared to the value of a potential reduction in fisheries that it could cause? And how to reconcile the gains to one group and the losses to another? How will salinity intrusion and agriculture downstream be affected if water is used for irrigation upstream? Because the river system is trans-boundary, all of these issues have international implications and need to be resolved through the framework of regional cooperation.

Read article in full here…

Visit The Nation Online