Shelling out help for Kingdom’s turtles

Kenneth Ingram and Phak Seangly for the Phnom Penh Post

Snapping at monks and government officials with jaws capable of shredding through bone, a rare adult Cantor’s Giant Soft-Shelled turtle was one of 100 reptiles given a new home at a conservation centre that aims to boost dwindling turtle populations in Cambodia.

The US$20,000 Mekong Turtle Conservation Centre, constructed by NGO Conservation International within the confines of 100 Pillar pagoda in Kartie province’s Sambro district, opened on Wednesday. It is intended as a sanctuary for four different types of turtles, including two endangered species, and contains facilities for raising baby turtles away from predators and researching the reptiles further.

Among the endangered reptiles are Cantor’s Giant Soft-shelled turtles, with individuals known to weigh over 110 pounds and two meters in length. Featuring a distinct snout that earns it the name of ‘frog head turtle’ in Khmer, the breed inhabits the depths of freshwater streams and inland slow-moving river systems, feeding primarily on aquatic plants, fish, crab and shrimp.

The turtles – thought to be extinct in Vietnam and on the brink of extinction in Thailand and Laos – were virtually undetected in Cambodia until a biological survey, conducted in 2007, gained international attention for spotting them in a pristine natural habitat along the Mekong River. The discovery was an impetus for the new conservation centre.

“This centre will provide turtles with a safe environment to mature before they are introduced to the wild,” project associate of Conservation International Sun Yoeung said, adding that baby turtles would be released once they reached between 10 months and two years old.

However, 15 four-day-old Cantor’s turtles were released into the river yesterday, a Conservation International spokeswoman said, in part to facilitate the filming of a nature programme by French filmmakers.

“We don’t want to take all of the hatchlings back to the centre because we don’t know if they will all survive [there],” explained Som Sitha, monitoring and evaluation coordinator at Conservation International, pointing out that Cantor’s turtles had never been raised in captivity before. “Also, we want to involve local fishermen and show them that we will release some turtles back into their habitat.”

Sun Yoeung, 33, project associate of Conservation International, said human activity remained the greatest threat to turtle habitats.

“Turtle nests are easily found by people because of the large tracks that adults leave in the sand,” he said. “People were eating the eggs, but this is less common now because of education about turtles.”

Turtles are also sold to markets as ingredients for traditional Chinese medicines, ornaments and pets.

Environmentalists also attribute human activity to the destruction and pollution of turtle habitats through fishing, farming, small-scale mining near the Mekong River.

Community partnerships have been central to the success of the conservation effort thus far, said Sun Yoeung, as fishermen and villagers continue to be educated about rare breeds.

He said the an incentive program, rewarding people with $10 for finding turtle nests and $6 per hatchling, had populated the conservation centre with about 100 turtles so far.

Main features of the new facility include 33 aquatic tanks as well as a large concrete pond, where one adult Cantor’s Giant Soft-shelled turtle is being displayed.

Partners of the turtle conservation effort include Conservation International, Cambodia’s Fisheries Administration and 100 Pillar Pagoda, in addition to the World Wildlife Fund and the Association of Buddhist Monks.

Source

Visit the Phnom Penh Post

Innovative Tool for Mekong Basin-wide sustainable hydropower assessment launched

MRC

A breakthrough in sustainable hydropower development has been made with the launch of an innovative new assessment tool that helps identify, in as little as a week, the most sustainable sites, designs and operation rules for hydropower development in the lower Mekong River Basin.

The Asian Development Bank, Mekong River Commission (MRC) and World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) launched the Rapid Basin-wide Hydropower Sustainable Development Tool or RSAT.

“This is a breakthrough in sustainable hydropower development because it allows for hydropower projects to be assessed within the basin-wide context, rather than on a case-by-case basis,” said Marc Goichot, Senior Infrastructure Advisor for WWF Greater Mekong Programme.

“The sustainability of hydropower projects cannot be assessed in isolation from one another. Their cumulative impacts need to be considered and this is the only way to ensure the ecosystems and the services they provide are conserved,” he added.

Currently, there are over 100 hydropower projects proposed for the lower Mekong River Basin that encompasses parts of Lao PDR, Cambodia, Thailand and Viet Nam. The tool is to be used by stakeholders such as government agencies and regulators, river basin organizations, developers, financial institutions and civil society groups. The tool uses existing social, environmental, cultural, economic and financial information on a river basin to make the rapid assessment.

“Sustainable hydropower requires that decisions about its development and management are placed in a river basin perspective. This involves a shift in thinking about water infrastructure as a wider development intervention, with more attention to the overall development effectiveness of projects beyond viewing infrastructure narrowly as a way to meet growing needs for water and energy services. In the long term this will also lead to local and national economic benefits,” says Jeremy Bird, the chief executive officer of the MRC Secretariat, an intergovernmental organisation working on sustainable development of the Mekong River Basin.

The RSAT is designed to enhance existing tools and processes such as Environmental Impact Assessments and Management Plans, not to replace them. It works by bringing together different sectors and institutions and seeks integrated basin-wide planning and cooperation.

“Cumulative impact assessments are complex and time consuming to undertake and often difficult for all interested stakeholders to grasp the complete picture of the technical, environmental, social and economic issues in play. The RSAT enables the knowledge of many stakeholders to be captured so that hydropower investments do bring the positive outcomes needed by society to ensure everyone benefits. The RSAT tools help identify and communicate key actions to ensure these benefits are sustainable,” says Ian W Makin, Senior Water Resources Specialist, ADB.

The tool can be used in a number of different ways depending on the stage of planning or implementation, including as a checklist for preliminary assessments; a framework for risk assessment; to facilitate dialogue among different groups; to adapt management to changing contexts; identify capacity building needs; for training and as a skills development tool.

Specifically the tool is designed to assess existing and proposed cascades of hydropower projects within a sub-basin or multiple projects within a basin of a tributary; a single hydropower project and its relationship to a tributary basin; a sub-basin as a whole that has hydropower potential; and trans-boundary issues for basins shared by different countries, where hydropower is already developed or could be developed in future. The tool has been developed in the context of the Mekong River, but is equally applicable elsewhere in the world.

The basin-wide assessment tool complements and builds on a similar project based tool developed by a multi-stakeholder initiative, the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum, and which focuses on the planning, design and operation stages of individual projects.

Financial support for the initiative has been provided by the governments of Germany and Finland and the USAID.

Source

More details on the workflow here:

http://www.mrcmekong.org/ish/SEA/RSAT-Revision-3-for-printing(OCT-3-2010)Corrected-FINAL.PDF

Vietnam rejects WWF claim, says its catfish clean

VNEconomyNews.com

The Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers has rejected a decision by the World Wide Fund for Nature to place tra, the Vietnamese cat fish, in the red list of produce that are farmed/made in filthy/unhygienic conditions or traded illegally.

It moved it from a yellow list in its latest consumer guides for Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Belgium, Norway, and Denmark.

The WWF highly recommends not consuming those in the red list and says that consumers can buy products from the yellow list though it is better to choose from a green list.

The green-listed products are good for health and pose no risk to the environment, while yellow-listed ones cause concern over overexploitation leading to extinction and cause harm to the environment and biodiversity.

VASEP’s letter rejecting the new classification has been sent to WWF global seafood co-coordinator Mark Powell.

The association and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development have also invited WWF representatives to make a fact-finding tour of Vietnam’s fish farms as well as the tra processing, preservation, and export process.

The WWF has accepted the invitation and will send its representatives next May.

VASEP believed tra has been moved to the red list because of “problems” relating to the environment, feed, chemicals, and medicine used in its farming, but there is no clear evidence for any of this.

Powell told Intrafish, a news and information website meant for global seafood professionals, that the downgrading stemmed from “problems with governance.”

Catfish farming is polluting the environment by discharging untreated wastes and pesticides directly into the environment, causing the risk of spreading infectious diseases from farmed fish to wild ones, he said.

But it is unclear why the WWF has different ratings for the same products in different markets.

Before the downgrade, organic pangasius was on the green list in Germany but on both the yellow and red lists in Belgium.

WWF Vietnam said it did not contribute anything to the assessment and so knows nothing about the criteria used in the case of the pangasius, but has contacted its main office in Switzerland for details.

Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development Luong Le Phuong, calling it an inaccurate assessment of Vietnamese catfish, told Tuoi Tre it is a blow for the industry.

Most tra processing and export companies have developed quality systems from breeding to processing, he pointed out.

Many have received Global GAP certification which assesses standards for agricultural produce, including aquaculture.

It is primarily designed to reassure consumers that production of their chosen food includes minimal detrimental environmental impact and limited use of chemicals and ensures worker health and safety and animal welfare.

Vietnam exported 538,200 tons of tra to more than 120 markets, including the US and the EU, for US$1.15 billion in the first 10 months of this year.

The EU is the biggest market for Vietnamese catfish, accounting for 36.8 percent of exports and worth $423 million in the first 10 months of this year.

Fighting on many fronts

Vietnamese seafood exporters last month criticized a European parliament member who alleged that pangasius or tra is farmed in “filthy” pools and polluted rivers.

They asked Struan Stevenson of Scotland to visit farms on the Mekong River and see the breeding pools for himself, Thanh Nien newspaper reported.

In his keynote address to the European Parliament early November, Stevenson said the river where the fish are raised is one of the most polluted on earth and factories along its banks pumped thousands of tons of contaminants daily into its slow-moving waters.

“As a result, the water is teeming with bacteria and poisoned with industrial effluents including arsenic, mercury, and DDT,” Stevenson said on his website, www.struanstevenson.com.

In his speech, Stevenson also said imports of the cheap fish were undercutting European fish farmers and allowing multinational firms to exploit virtual “slave labor” in Vietnam.

The US catfish industry has also accused Vietnam of raising fish in unsanitary conditions.

In October the Catfish Farmers of America (CFA) began airing TV ads urging the government to transfer the responsibility of inspecting pangasius imports from the Food and Drug Administration to the Department of Agriculture.

In the ads, the CFA said the Mekong is “full of contaminants.”

In May it launched www.safecatfish.com, which attacks the sanitary quality of catfish imported from Vietnam.

It called the Mekong Delta, where the pangasius is raised, “polluted and contaminated.” Posted on the site is a new report titled “Dirty Waters, Dangerous Fish” that makes allegations about the “unsanitary” conditions in which the fish are farmed.

But the National Fisheries Institute shot back accusing the CFA of distorting the truth and scaring consumers into believing that imported catfish is unsafe to eat.

Stephen Taylor, sales director of the UK-based Findus Group, was quoted by the website fishsite.com as saying last month that catfish is a good choice for the EU consumers.

He assured the products are safe since they are imported by the most prestigious importers worldwide.

Source

Visit VIETNAM BUSINESS & ECONOMY NEWS

China Hydropower Dams in Mekong River Give Shocks to 60 Million

Yoolim Lee for Bloomberg

The Mekong River sparkles in the early morning sun as Somwang Prommin, a stocky fisherman wearing a worn-out black T-shirt and shorts, starts the motor of his boat. As the tiny craft glides on the river’s calm surface in the northeastern Thai district of Chiang Khong, Somwang points to a nearby riverbank. Three days ago, he says, the water levels there were 3 meters (10 feet) higher.

The Mekong, which translates roughly as “mother of the waters” in the Thai language, has become unpredictable since China started building hydropower dams and blasting the rapids upstream, says Somwang, 36, who’s been fishing for a living since he was 8.

In August 2008, there were devastating floods that reduced his catches and income, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its December 2010 issue. Early this year, he witnessed the most severe drought in his life.

Tens of millions of residents are experiencing similar currents of change along the 4,800-kilometer-long (2,980-mile- long) Mekong, which flows through six countries — Southeast Asia’s longest river.

From its source in the Tibetan plateau, the river traverses China’s Yunnan province, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam before pouring into the South China Sea.

Livelihood Threatened

The Mekong and its tributaries provide food, water and transportation to about 60 million people in Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam. Their livelihood is now threatened as their governments turn to hydroelectric dams along the river to generate power and create revenue.

China, hungry for electricity to fuel its breakneck growth, has already built four hydropower dams on the Mekong, completing the first one in 1993 without consulting its downstream neighbors.

As it prepares to overtake Japan as the world’s second- largest economy this year, China wants to almost double its hydropower capacity to at least 300 gigawatts by 2020 by building four more dams on the Mekong, called Lancang Jiang, or Turbulent River, in Chinese. That would give China 15 gigawatts of power on the river.

Those projects will have a disastrous impact on Cambodia and Vietnam, says Milton Osborne, a visiting fellow at the Lowy Institute in Sydney and a historian who wrote “The Mekong: Turbulent Past, Uncertain Future” (Allen & Unwin, 2006).

‘Selfish Lack of Concern’

“What the Chinese are doing shows a selfish lack of concern for the serious damage their dams will ultimately do to the downstream countries,” Osborne says.

Downriver, other countries are pursuing their own objectives. Communist Laos has proposed building 10 hydropower plants on the mainstream of the Mekong that will export electricity and transform the nation — one of Asia’s poorest, with a per-capita gross domestic product of $886 — into what the government calls “the battery of Southeast Asia.”

Cambodia plans to build two dams near the border with Laos. In all, 12 dams are planned by the countries below China along the mainstream of the Mekong.

More than 130 hydropower projects are either operating or projected for the river and its tributaries, according to the Mekong River Commission, the intergovernmental group known as the MRC.

Competition to exploit — or conserve — the limited water resources is creating tensions among China, the countries of the MRC and international environmental organizations.

‘Disaster for Fisheries’

“Dams would spell disaster for Mekong fisheries and ecology, a risk that millions of people in the region cannot afford to take,” says Aviva Imhof, campaigns director of International Rivers, a Berkeley, California-based nonprofit group that aims to protect rivers and human rights. “The Mekong mainstream should be off-limits to the region’s dam builders.”

The struggle to develop the Mekong mirrors those around the world where water resources are becoming increasingly scarce. The United Nations estimated last year that almost half the world’s population will live in areas of “water stress” by 2030 as a result of climate change, population growth and increased demand for food, energy and biofuels.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — a group set up by the UN Environment Programme and the World Meteorological Organization — says the Mekong’s delta is one of the three on the planet most vulnerable to the impact of climate change, including rising sea levels, saline intrusion and storms that erode the coastline and undermine its ecosystem.

Mekong Delta

Building dams will worsen those effects, says Dekila Chungyalpa, director of the Greater Mekong Program at the World Wildlife Fund in Washington.

Building the proposed 12 mainstream dams with a total installed capacity of 14,697 megawatts would generate as much as $3.7 billion of annual revenue, according to the MRC’s report on the environmental impact of the mainstream dams in the lower Mekong, published this month. As much as 31 percent of the money would accrue to the governments of Cambodia and Laos.

Still, the dams would transform 55 percent of the downstream river into a reservoir, making it into a series of impoundments with slow water movement. The report, prepared by an independent consulting firm in Australia, recommended that MRC delay any decision on constructing the dams for 10 years.

The dams “have the potential to create transboundary impacts and international tensions,” the report says. “One dam across the lower Mekong mainstream commits the river to irrevocable change.”

‘Killing the Tree’

“It’s like cutting the trunk of a tree,” says Richard Cronin, director of the Southeast Asia Program at the Stimson Center, an independent research institute in Washington. “It will kill the tree.”

Chinese officials say they are aiding the environment, not harming it. Building dams “is an important step taken by the Chinese government to vigorously develop renewable and clean energy and contribute to the global endeavor to counter climate change,” Song Tao, the country’s vice minister of foreign affairs told a summit meeting of the MRC in April.

China aims to generate 15 percent of its power from non- fossil-fuel sources by 2020, up from about 8 percent now.

The most-controversial projects are the 4,200-megawatt Xiaowan dam in China, the tallest arch dam in the world, and the 1,260-megawatt Xayabouri dam in northern Laos, the first project proposed by the Laotian government to be built in the lower Mekong region.

Controversial Dams

The 240-megawatt Don Sahong, located in the Khone Falls area in southern Laos and 1 kilometer upstream of the Cambodian border, would block the area’s most important fish migration route, undermining fisheries-based livelihoods throughout the basin, environmentalists say.

“The Mekong is very much an interconnected system,” says Jeremy Bird, chief executive officer of the MRC in Vientiane, the capital of Laos. “If you intervene in one area, you see consequences somewhere else,” says Bird, whose office overlooks the river.

Spanning 14 kilometers at its widest point, the Mekong is home to more than 1,200 different species of fish — making it second in biodiversity only to the Amazon. They include endangered species such as the Mekong giant catfish and the Irrawaddy freshwater dolphin.

The lower Mekong basin is the world’s largest inland source of fish, accounting for almost 20 percent of the world’s freshwater fish yield, worth as much as $9.4 billion a year, according to the WorldFish Center, an international nonprofit research group based in Malaysia.

Source of Protein

Fish from Tonle Sap, a lake and tributary, and the Mekong, for example, provide more than 70 percent of the protein in the diet of Cambodia’s 15 million people.

Following the Mekong’s path downriver from northern Thailand to Laos and Cambodia by boat and car, it’s evident how everyday life is entwined with the river’s natural rhythm.

Mekong waters replenish crops, livestock and households and are used in recreation and transportation. People catch fish by the riverbank or on a narrow long-tail boat by using ubiquitous handmade nets or fish traps made of bamboo; women wash dishes and clothes; children swim, laugh and play. They don’t use any bait; they rest the net on the bottom for just a few minutes before scooping the fish that pass by.

In September in central Laos, a three-day festival is being held along the river to celebrate the annual dragon boat racing. Twenty men wearing bright yellow, orange, red, green and blue shirts row each of the five dragon boats.

Beer Lao, Algae Snacks

While loudspeakers blast local pop songs, children watch the race and men and women drink Beer Lao and munch on snacks of dried algae.

Until the 20th century, the Mekong River remained largely unchanged from the days when it was explored by the French Mekong expedition. Led by Francis Garnier, the team traveled up the river from Vietnam to southern Yunnan in 1866 and 1867.

Plans to develop hydropower along the river have ebbed and flowed since 1954, after Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia gained independence from France.

In the late 1950s, studies by the UN and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation proposed building dams that would help control floods, irrigate crops and improve navigation. Those plans were never carried out because the Mekong became the setting of the Vietnam War.

Greater Mekong Program

After the war ended in 1975, political turbulence in the region prevented any dam projects from proceeding until 1992, when the Asian Development Bank launched the Greater Mekong Subregion Program. Endorsed by the region’s governments, the program envisioned building a railway system, roads and bridges to connect the more than 300 million people who live around the Mekong. When the Asian financial crisis struck in 1997, those plans were halted.

Now the region is again growing rapidly, led by China, which expanded 9.1 percent in 2009 and an estimated 10.5 percent this year, according to the International Monetary Fund. That’s increasing pressure to develop hydropower resources.

“Water represents one of the great diplomatic and development opportunities of our time,” U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said at a speech in March marking World Water Day. Last year, Clinton established the so-called Lower Mekong Initiative as a way to address regional environmental challenges. The U.S. government plans to spend $22 million this year on environmental programs in Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam.

Record Drought

This year’s record drought has heightened tensions among the nations along the river. In April, prime ministers from the MRC countries held their first summit.

Chinese officials, who also attended the meeting, held at Thailand’s beach resort town of Hua Hin, told the conference that China, too, is suffering from drought.

Most rivers in southern China are at about 40 percent of normal levels, and more than 600 have dried up completely, leaving almost 20 million people short of drinking water, Chen Mingzhong, an official at the Water Resources Ministry, told the conference.

“As an upstream country with a high sense of responsibility, we do nothing harming the interest of riparian countries downstream,” Chen said. Chinese officials declined to comment for this article.

China has taken steps to strengthen its cooperation with the MRC in recent years, Bird says. At the height of the drought in March, China agreed for the first time to provide the MRC with dry-season data on water levels and volume from its two hydrological stations. It already had been sharing its data during the flood season since 2002.

Chinese Dams

In June, China, the MRC’s dialogue partner since 1996, invited officials from the four nations and the MRC Secretariat to visit the Jing Hong and Xiaowan dams in Yunnan province.

China says its dams are beneficial because they can store water for the dry season and control flooding in the rainy season.

The Mekong has three seasons. The cool, dry period runs from November to February. March and April are the hottest months, when Thailand, Laos and Cambodia celebrate the New Year.

Then the wet season begins. With the May monsoon the Mekong fills, expanding Cambodia’s Tonle Sap, or Great Lake, to more than five times its dry-season size of 2,700 square kilometers (1,040 square miles). By July, the Khone Falls in southern Laos — the widest waterfall in the world — is in full flood, turning its crystal-blue waters to muddy brown.

Vietnam’s Rice Basket

After September, the floodwaters begin to recede. The river flows into the Mekong Delta, allowing Vietnam to have three crops of rice a year.

Like the fishermen in northern Thailand who are experiencing the impact of the Chinese dams upstream, residents in the northern Cambodian province of Stung Treng are facing the consequences of a dam built in a neighboring country: Vietnam.

Bu Sonthana, who fishes and farms in the village of Banmai, says the local Mekong tributary started fluctuating erratically in 1996. Since then, flooding of the Sesan River has destroyed crops and the riverbank gardens where her village of 97 households grows tomatoes and tobacco during the dry season. Bu Sonthana, 59, says it was only in 2001 that her community learned Vietnam was damming the river 80 kilometers upstream.

By then, the $1 billion, 720-megawatt Yali Falls Dam had commenced full operation, according to Ian Baird, an assistant geography professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who has carried out research on transboundary impact assessment in the Sesan River basin. MRC data show hourly water level changes in the Sesan River of as much as 1 meter in January 2003.

Unpredictable Floods

Rainy-season flooding, to which communities have long been attuned, has been unusually severe and unpredictable since Vietnam began building the dam, Bu Sonthana says.

“It has become more difficult to catch the fish and farm,” she says, sitting on the dirt floor in front of her wooden shack with a dozen family members and neighbors. “We didn’t mind the floods before because they brought us a lot of fish and we knew the water would recede naturally. Now it takes many more days for the water to recede.”

Vietnamese officials didn’t respond to requests for comment for this story.

“The governments say they are building dams to alleviate poverty,” Baird says. “If you ask the local people, they don’t feel any richer. So whose poverty are they alleviating?”

Nam Theun 2 Dam

International agencies such as the ADB and the World Bank say Laos’s Nam Theun 2 hydropower dam, which started operating in March, is a model for how such projects can help eradicate poverty.

“It is probably the most scrutinized hydropower project to date,” Bird says. “To what extent the lessons from the Nam Theun 2 project will be incorporated to others — that’s the real test because it shouldn’t be seen as an isolated project.”

The model was long in the making. The Laotian government first targeted Nam Theun 2 and invited the World Bank to participate in the 1980s.

Some 27 Thai and Western banks and export credit agencies financed the project, which has cost $1.3 billion, slightly more than estimated, the World Bank says. The government formed a joint venture to operate the dam, Nam Theun 2 Power Co., whose shareholders include Electricite de France SA, which owns 35 percent, and Electricity Generating Public Co. of Thailand, with 25 percent.

In 2003, Thailand’s state-run utility EGAT agreed to buy power from the 1,070-megawatt dam.

Government Revenue

In June, the Laotian government received $600,000, the first revenue from exporting the dam’s electricity, according to a World Bank report. The government is set to earn an average of $80 million per year during the first 25 years of the dam’s operation, the report says.

About 6,200 villagers were resettled to make way for the reservoir the dam created. Some say their lives have improved. In Nong Boua, 60 kilometers from the dam, 63 households now live in wooden houses built on stilts along the road compared with shacks they lived in before with no roads.

“It’s nice to have a school and a clinic,” says a villager named Khammai. “But it’s become more difficult to irrigate the land.”

Downstream from the dam, where about 120,000 people live, villagers tell a different story. In Veun Sananh, a village of 76 families, a 45-year-old villager who only identified himself by his first name, Kham, says about 35 adults and children suffered from skin rashes after fishing in the river.

Officials from Nam Theun 2 Power visited the village in June with antihistamine creams.

Skin Rashes

In the nearby Boeung Xe village, a 54-year-old villager named Boun says 13 of the 350 people in his village had a skin irritation this year after bathing in the river.

Nam Theun 2 Power has been investigating the skin rash complaints and has brought in dermatologists and other experts to help, according to a company spokesman, Aiden Glendinning. About 4 to 5 percent of the total population of the affected areas suffered from rashes during the peak period of May, and about 20 cases remained as of mid-October, he says.

The company is also monitoring complaints about the fish catch, he says. The dam has increased the flow of water during the dry season.

“Some villagers who are used to catching fish by wading in shallow areas during the dry season will now find this practice more difficult,” he says. “Other people who fish from boats have reported increased fish catch.”

Cambodia

About 700 kilometers south of Nam Theun 2, the Mekong reaches Phnom Penh before flowing into the Mekong Delta and then spilling into the South China Sea. A bustling city of 2 million people dotted with temples and buildings from the French colonial era, the Cambodian capital, too, depends on the river for its livelihood.

“I’ve vaguely heard of some dams, but no one is really talking about it here,” says Pich Pov, 28, who operates a small cruise boat and lives aboard it with his family. “The Mekong is my mother. Everyone I know was born on this river, and she provides us with food and shelter.”

If China and its neighbors carry out all their dam-building plans, the Mekong may cease to be the nurturing mother of the waters for Pich Pov and millions more and instead be a turbulent river.

To contact the reporter on this story: Yoolim Lee in Singapore at [email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Laura Colby at [email protected]

Source

Visit Bloomberg

A tree falls in Laos

By Beaumont Smith for Asia Times Online

VIENTIANE – With Pakistan suffering from unprecedented deforestation-driven flooding, are once forested, now denuded Southeast Asian countries the next natural disasters in waiting? The collusion between government, military and illegal loggers largely responsible for Pakistan’s humanitarian crisis has taken a similarly severe toll on Southeast Asia’s crucial upland forests.

The widespread destruction of the forests of Malaysia and Indonesia to make way for biofuel, palm-oil, rubber and paper-pulp plantations has been well-documented, and witnessed in the smog that frequently floats over the region from slash-and-burn deforestation. Now, the impact from years of unregulated logging in Laos, often presumed to be one of the last bastions of old forest in the region, is coming into sharper view.

The fact that the Laotian military maintains both legal and illegal logging operations is an open secret here; what is less known are the details of the profit-sharing agreements the military has with neighboring Vietnam and how these deals have contributed to massive deforestation in recent years. The Vietnamese army is widely believed to be extracting payment in timber along the border for the costs it incurs to help defend Laotian territory.

The state of Laos’ forests is increasingly relevant to discussions on global climate change. Scientists now weigh the relative importance and efficiency of old and new forests for carbon sequestration, or the ability to absorb rising atmospheric carbon loads. Among the old forests of global significance are the stands of sequoias, redwoods and Douglas firs that extend from northern California to British Columbia, and the wet tropical forests of Laos, Malaysia and Indonesia, experts say.

These last wooded stands have sparked a sharp debate about how forests should be managed, particularly whether carbon-storing older trees should be cut to make way for carbon-using younger ones. The picture is made more complicated by news that old-growth forests’ capacity to absorb carbon has declined recently, ironically because of droughts attributed to climate change. The ambiguity surrounding the carbon-absorbing value of old-versus-young trees has provided a lacuna within which forests are being felled.

The United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) has suggested that countries should strive to maintain 40% cover to sufficiently protect forest lands. Some forestry experts, however, take issue with the sufficiency of that measure and how regional governments massage their numbers. Laos claims to maintain this benchmark percentage, but independent experts question that official assessment considering the widespread cutting underway.

“Laos insists it still has 40% of its forests, but in fact the dense crown cover, that is the old growth or relatively intact forest, accounts for only 3% of what is left,” said a forestry consultant with over 40 years’ experience in Asia. “And that only exists because it’s hard to access.”

“Laos has an additional 23% that is seriously degraded, that is a few tall trees with lots of bamboo understory and regrowth saplings, and another 11% that is so scrappy it has little or no value for biodiversity,” he said.

The consultant also said official statistics indicate that Laos is felling around 50 million cubic meters of wood per year, but that harvest does not show up in export statistics. “Our question is: where is it going?” he said. “We found that Vietnam exports more than it produces, so we can only surmise that Laotian trees find their way into Vietnam. We know there is a lot of cross-border trade.”

During a recent investigation at the southern Laotian border crossing at Attapeu, the consultant saw several trucks loaded with unmarked logs rolling into Vietnam. When he asked customs officials whether the logs were being exported in accordance with national guidelines, they responded that Laos did not have the capacity to process the wood so it was sent to Vietnam. They said the wood was often shipped from Vietnam to Russia to pay debts owed from their Cold-War-era patron-client relations.

“The figures all across Asia are unreliable,” the expert said. “Indonesia, for instance, only records what is exported and does not account for its huge domestic market – and what gets shipped offshore in the dead of night.”

Martial chainsaws
There are powerful military interests behind Laos’ timber trade.

General Cheng Sayavong, whose enterprises now include the country’s only private TV station, previously headed the Borisat Phattana Khed Phudoi (BPKP) – or the Mountain Areas Development Company – and once served as chairman of the country’s National Tourism Authority. The BPKP, which once consisted of 58 subsidiaries, is believed to have deforested much of the precipitous terrain to the south of Vientiane province, where the national capital is situated.

Given a key contract for highway maintenance in and around Vientiane, the BPKP logged most of the mature Honduras mahogany trees lining the road into the city. These trees, highly valued for their shade and beauty, were planted by French colonial landscape architects nearly a century ago. Commercially extinct in the wild, it is worth as much as US$6,000 per cubic meter as sawn timber, experts say. The general has allegedly also been involved in the trade of rare hinoki cypress wood, which his companies are said to have extracted by helicopter and shipped to Japan via Vietnam.

The World Bank has attempted to limit the role of other military-backed companies in the Laotian economy, but with limited success. Many have persisted in the trade and through their privileged access to remote areas have diversified into mining. Laos’ Ministry of Forestry, which is responsible for enforcement of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), has tried to regulate logging, particularly in protected areas.

“We catch many people. We ask them who they are working for and they give us the names of some very important people,” said one forestry inspector who requested anonymity. “We then phone to ask them about the activities and they deny it. What can we do? They are big-bellied people.”

Because there is no unified enforcement mechanism of CITES obligations, international conservation organizations, including the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), play a leading watchdog role. A WWF staff member who spoke on condition of anonymity said that the provincial government of Sekong in southern Laos was often so strapped for cash that it resorted to logging its remaining forests to generate funds.

“The provinces are promised 10% of the royalties paid to the central government for timber concessions. It rarely arrives,” the WWF staffer said. “The upshot of that is that a plan we had to protect existing forest had to be modified into developing new community forests when the local governments literally ran out of funds and had to cut their trees.”

That has raised questions about Communist Party control over peripheral areas. Eisel Mazard, an independent scholar who works on Laotian issues, wrote that in early 2007 a number of highly placed members of the politburo wanted an absolute end to logging inside the country’s conservation areas.

The call came after extreme deforestation in the Phou Khao Khouay National Biodiversity Conservation Area caused low water levels at the area’s three hydroelectric dams. Despite those concerns, government policy still allows for logging, farming and the development of industrial estates inside these national conservation areas.

That policy is at least partially motivated by an urge to manage dissent in the poorly paid military. “The Laotian army reminds me of Napoleonic forces that lived off the land, pillaging and foraging,” mused Jim Osborne, a visiting military historian. The WWF staffer agreed, “They don’t get paid, so they have to cut timber, poach or mine for income.”

Vietnamese commercial interests are another push factor. Christy Lee, executive director of Hmong National Development Inc, a Washington-based non-profit organization, noted in a statement that “illegal logging, by Vietnamese military-owned companies, is taking place at the same time significant numbers of Vietnamese troops have been mobilized in Laos, in cooperation with Laotian troops”.

The statement claimed that much of the illegal logging was taking place in jungle and highland-forest areas where ethnic Hmong people lived, especially in Khammoune, Luang Prabang, Vientiane and Xieng Khouang provinces, and in the Saysamboune closed military zone.

Philip Smith, executive director of the Center for Public Policy Analysis in Washington, wrote this year that illegal logging and political persecution of forest dwellers, in particular the Hmong, had recently accelerated under the watch of Vietnamese troops.

Other experts say that controlling logging in Laos is nearly impossible without accurate data and enforcement mechanisms. Technical assistance agencies such as the FAO seem willing to go along with the Laotian government’s inflated 40% estimate of forest cover. But the reality is that Laos and the region’s last stands of ecologically important old forests are falling fast.

Beaumont Smith is a Vientiane-based journalist.

Source

Visit Asia Times

NGOs campaign to defer dams construction in Lower Mekong Basin

People’s Daily Online

Campaigners on Tuesday expressed concern against the members from the Lower Mekong Basin to continue building dams to meet energy demands.

In an interview with reporter in Bangkok on Tuesday, Carl Middleton from International Rivers said that concerned activists have been calling the Mekong River Commission (MRC) to defer the construction of 12 dams.

He gave the remark as several civil and environmental groups, including International Rivers, Probe International and World Wildlife Fund gathered together in Bangkok and called on the MRC to live up to its mandate to protect the Mekong River.

International Rivers, a U.S.-based NGO, seeks to protect rivers and defend the rights of communities that depend on them, Carl said.

Carl said the MRC, which comprises Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, also seemed to be slow or even fail to carry out its duty by turning a blind eye to the decision to construct dams in the Lower Mekong Basin.

The Mekong River originates in the Tibetan plateau and flows 4, 800 kilometers (2,980 miles) through Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia before entering into the sea from Vietnam.

“Any dam built on downstream sections would cause dramatic changes to the river. By blocking vital fish migration routes and sediment flows, the dams will significantly alter the river’s rich biodiversity,” said Carl, “this will result in fishery losses, impacting the livelihoods and food security of millions.”

Experts have repeatedly warned that any Lower Mekong mainstream dam will carry important risks to food security, given its impact on fisheries and agriculture.

It is estimated that the Lower Mekong produces 2.5 to 3 million tons of fish annually. An important part of this production – between 600,000 to 1.4 million tons would be at risk if Lower Mekong mainstream dams were constructed, they said.

“All impacts are incremental,” said Marc Goichot, Sustainable Infrastructure Senior Advisor to the World Wildlife Fund’s Greater Mekong Program.

Source: Xinhua but here on the People’s Daily Online

See also: ‘Mekong commission accused of ignoring own findings on dam impacts’ as this seems to be the same story…or certainly some of the same quotes.

Mekong tiger population plunges to ‘crisis point’: WWF

From AFP

Governments must act decisively to prevent the extinction of tigers in Southeast Asia’s Greater Mekong region, where numbers have plunged more than 70 percent in 12 years, the WWF said Tuesday.

The wild tiger population across Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam has dropped from an estimated 1,200 in 1998 — the last Year of Tiger — to around 350 today, according to the conservation group.

The report was released ahead of a landmark three-day conference on tiger conservation, which will be attended in the Thai resort town of Hua Hin from Wednesday by ministers from 13 Asian tiger range countries.

It said the regional decline was reflected in the global wild tiger population, which is at an all-time low of 3,200, down from an estimated 20,000 in the 1980s and 100,000 a century ago.

“Today, wild tiger populations are at a crisis point,” the WWF said, ahead of the start of the Year of the Tiger on February 14, according to the Chinese lunar calendar.

It cited growing demand for tiger body parts used in traditional Chinese medicine as a major factor endangering the region’s Indochinese tiger population.

Read article…

Visit Sydney Morning Herald

Visit Agence France-Presse

Cambodia threatens to suspend WWF after dolphin report

Monsters & Critics

Phnom Penh – A Cambodian official Wednesday threatened to suspend the operations of an international wildlife group after it released a report claiming an endangered dolphin species was at risk of extinction due to pollution in the Mekong River.

Touch Seang Tana, chairman of Cambodia’s Commission for Conversation and Development of the Mekong River Dolphins Eco-Tourism Zone, said World Wildlife Foundation (WWF) investigators faced suspension unless they met with him to discuss their report.

The WWF report released last week said 88 dolphins had died since 2003 and researchers had found toxic levels of pesticides and environmental contaminants in their analysis of Irrawaddy dolphin calves.

Read article…

Visit Monsters & Critics Online

Report citing pollutants’ threat to dolphins draws furious govt rebuke

Written by Sam Rith | Phnom Penh Post | Friday, 19 June 2009

A NEW report that pollution in the Mekong River was in part responsible for the deaths of 88 Irrawaddy dolphins since 2003 prompted a harsh rebuttal from a government official, who on Thursday dismissed the findings as “all lies”.

The report, released Thursday by the international conservation group WWF, found that pollution in the Mekong River had pushed local Irrawaddy dolphins “to the brink of extinction”.

Read article…

Visit Phnom Penh Post Online

Mekong River dolphins at risk of extinction, WWF says

Featured

CNN

The Mekong River Irrawaddy dolphin population inhabits a 190-kilometer (118-mile) stretch of the Mekong River between Cambodia and Laos, the WWF said.

Since 2003, the population has suffered 88 deaths, more than 60 percent of which were calves less than 2 weeks old, the WWF said.

Only an estimated 64 to 76 dolphins are in the river, the group said.

“Necropsy analysis identified a bacterial disease as the cause of the calf deaths,” Dove said. “This disease would not be fatal unless the dolphins’ immune systems were suppressed, as they were in these cases, by environmental contaminants.”

Researchers found toxic levels of pesticides such as DDT and environmental contaminants such as PCBs in the dead dolphin calves. The pollutants also might endanger people along the Mekong who consume the same fish and water as the dolphins, the group said.

Researchers also found high levels of mercury in some of the dead dolphins. Mercury weakens the immune system, making the animals more susceptible to disease. The mercury might come from gold mining, the WWF said.

The group called for a cross-border preventive health program to manage the diseased animals and reduce their deaths.

Read article…

Visit the place where the most northerly pods of Irrawaddy Dolphins remain on The Mekong… Ramsar Site 999

Visit CNN Online

Visit WWF Greater Mekong Online