Another Amazon activist killed

In what appears to be an all too regular occurrence in Brazil, Al Jazeera’s Gabriel Elizondo reports…

Adelino Ramos’s murder comes days after the slaying of José Cláudio Ribeiro da Silva.

Brazilian police have confirmed the killing of yet another Amazon environmental campaigner.

Adelino Ramos was known for openly denouncing those who illegally fell trees in the rainforest. His is just the latest in a long line of murders of such activists.

Source

Visit Al Jazeera

More on José Cláudio Ribeiro da Silva from The Guardian here

Drought in the Yangtze river basin - in pictures

Asia’s biggest river is experiencing its worst drought in 50 years - damaging crops, threatening wildlife and raising doubts about the viability of China’s massive water diversion ambitions.

See more from The Guardian with a portfolio picked from the wire services here.

Jiangxi province, Poyang lake: A boat is stranded on the cracked bed of the lake | Photograph: China Daily/Reuters

Resurrecting the Dead Sea

With the Dead Sea drying up as a result of rising water demand, the historic body of water may one day disappear writes Emily Sohn for Discovery News

The Dead Sea has been drying up at a dramatic rate in recent decades as a result mostly of human demands for water. But instead of letting the historic body of water continue to disappear, some scientists are getting increasingly serious about trying to save it.

In the most ambitious and detailed proposal yet, officials are considering a massive engineering project that would pump water into the Dead Sea from the Red Sea more than 110 miles to the south. Water pipes would follow the border between Israel and Jordan, earning the project a conciliatory nickname, “The Peace Conduit,” for its potential to ease tensions between two extremely thirsty nations.

An international consortium of researchers has been weighing environmental and financial impacts of the multi-billion-dollar plan for a recent series of reports to the World Bank. As the conversation continues, its consequences stretch beyond the Middle East.

Water woes plague regions around the world. And water-related infrastructure projects span the globe, from the massive Three Gorges Dam in China, to a multitude of dams and irrigation diversions along the Colorado River.

In hindsight, the history of water projects offers a number of cautionary tales, said Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute, an independent environmental research organization in Oakland, Calif.

“I would argue that every single project that has been built has had unforeseen consequences, from the littlest to the biggest,” Gleick said. “The big engineering water projects of the 20th century were typically built with consideration given only to technological questions, not to environmental, political, social and economic questions.”

“The Red Sea-Dead Sea project is an example of the extremes we’re willing to consider when water resources are seriously constrained,” he added. “In the Middle East, water is really short. Jordan, Israel and the Palestinians desperately need water. I completely understand how they got into this fix.”

At more than 1,300 feet below sea level, the Dead Sea’s shores are the lowest spots of dry land on Earth. Hot, dry and surrounded by dramatic rock structures, the area attracts visitors for its Biblical history, stunning archeological sites, and extremely buoyant waters.

Some ascribe healing powers to the muddy shores and mineral-rich salts.

The Dead Sea has also proven attractive to the potash industry. Two major companies, Dead Sea Works, Ltd., on the Israeli side and the Arab Potash Company on the Jordanian side, intentionally evaporate water from the Sea to extract millions of tons of mineral-filled salts for use as fertilizer and for other industrial applications.

Pressure on the Dead Sea also comes from two nations full of thirsty people, who remove large amounts of water from the Jordan River and other inflows to use for drinking and agriculture.

For thousands of years, the surface of Dead Sea fluctuated around a generally stable level of about 400 meters (1,300 feet) below sea level.

By 1950, though, human activities had started to make an impact. Then, the water level began to drop at a rate of 30 centimeters (about a foot) each year.

Since 2000, that rate has accelerated to about a meter (more than three feet) a year.

Overall, the level of the Dead Sea has dropped by more than 30 meters (nearly 100 feet) since the early 1930s.

“There is no doubt that human intervention in the water balance has caused the disruption,” said geologist Jiwchar Ganor, an environmental geochemist at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel. “There’s no question. It’s our fault.”

Meanwhile, the region gets just 75 millimeters (three inches) of rain each year. That essentially means that the only way to replace the water that people take from the Dead Sea would be to manually put water back in.

“We need new interventions,” Ganor added. “But we need to make sure they will not induce new and undesired processes.”

It’s far from clear what the perfect solution will be for saving the Dead Sea, or whether there is a good solution at all.

Doing nothing has already had profound impacts. As the sea shrinks, underground layers of salt have dissolved, leading to the sudden formation of sinkholes, which damage roads and bridges and threaten lives.

More than 2,500 sinkholes now line the shores of the Dead Sea. Most have appeared since 2000.

Scientists are also concerned about losing recently discovered and yet-to-be discovered microorganisms with unique metabolisms and unexplored genetics.

Microscopic residents of such a specialized and sensitive ecosystem could harbor insights that might lead researchers to new ways of helping crops grow better in stressful situations. That could eventually help improve food security for the millions of people that live in dry and salty places around the world.

While the idea for pumping water into the Dead Sea is not new, the discussion has taken on a new urgency recently as global water shortages rapidly become crises. And while it’s a discussion worth having, Gleick said, conversations will need to dig more deeply to truly solve any of the world’s water issues.

“In the 21st century, we have to look beyond purely engineering solutions toward more comprehensive and sustainable answers,” he said, such as finding ways to use water more efficiently in the first place.

“We have a leaky bucket,” he added, “and before we can put more expensive water in, it may make sense to plug the leaks.”

Source

Visit Discovery News

International Day of Biodiversity – let’s put conservation at the heart of politics

Unless biodiversity loss goes on the agenda of every minister from transport to trade, our generation will fail the next one writes Janez Potočnik for The Guardian

International Day of Biodiversity, is on 22 May, and it’s not only a good reason to celebrate nature, it is also a reminder that we are not the only form of life on this planet.

We might think of ourselves as an intelligent species but our self-destructive behaviour, at least as far as nature’s delicate infrastructure is concerned, shows little evidence that this is true. The well-documented fact is that we are at risk of destroying this precious planet for future generations, or at least saddling them with an enormous financial and environmental legacy of having to fix the problems we couldn’t.

This callous disregard is directly linked to growth. During the 20th century, the human population grew by four times and economic output by 40 times. We increased our fossil fuel use by 16 times, our fishing catches by 35 and our water use by 9. At the same time – and it is no coincidence – we have been living through an alarming global decline in species and natural habitats at up to 1,000 times the natural rate. In the EU alone, up to one quarter of animal species is threatened with extinction and 88% of our fish stocks are over-exploited. Most of our ecosystem services are ‘degraded’ – ie no longer able to deliver those basic and largely unknown, yet vital services such as crop pollination, clean air and water, and control of floods or erosion.

By 2050 the global population will have risen to 9 billion people. It doesn’t take a genius to work out that we are on the very slippery slope towards ecological disaster.

Protecting nature is both a moral and ethical issue. It goes without saying that we must preserve the planet’s natural wonders for its own sake and for future generations, but if that is not a convincing enough argument for some people than the economic argument should be. It is in our own interest to conserve and restore them – otherwise we are just biting the hand that feeds us. And if we don’t make those smart investments now to protect biodiversity and the healthy ecosystems around us, then we face even heavier bills later trying to restore what has been lost.

This is not blind faith in nature. There is documented, solid economic thinking behind it. The Economy of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) study estimates that business opportunities from investments in nature could be worth US$2-6tr by 2050, and recommends factoring the true economic value of biodiversity into decision-making and reflecting it in systems of national accounts.

The study contains some startling figures. Here a few examples: the total economic value of insect pollination is estimated at US$153bn per year, representing nearly 10% of world agricultural output for human food. The annual loss of opportunity due to over-exploitation of global fisheries is estimated at US$50bn. The city of New York saved US$6.5bn by investing in maintaining natural water purification services in the Catskills watershed rather than opting for a filtration plant.

So what can we do about it? World environment ministers agreed last year in Nagoya on a global strategy to combat biodiversity loss. This was a success in itself, but the challenge now is to follow through and implement those targets. It is a challenge that needs to be taken up in the widest possible way. It has to be on the agenda of not just environment ministers but also of the ministers dealing with agriculture, fisheries, industry, transport, research, trade … Halting biodiversity loss needs to be discussed in parliaments, boardrooms and in living rooms. I will be doing my bit within the EU to try to make sure this happens at political level. I hope many others will join me.

There is a well-known Cree Indian Prophecy that says: “Only after the last tree has been cut down, only after the last river has been poisoned, only after the last fish has been caught, only then will you find that money cannot be eaten.”

I would not like to belong to the generation that proves the wisdom of the Cree Indians.

Janez Potočnik is european commissioner for environment

Source

Visit The Guardian

U.S. Conservation Group Releases Top 10 ‘Endangered Rivers’ Report

Brett Wilson for Circle of Blue

American Rivers’ annual list highlights waterways with an immediate threat to their ecosystems.

Mining, gas drilling, and untreated wastewater are some of the primary threats to the health of rivers in the United States, according to an annual report from American Rivers, an environmental advocacy group. Other obstacles to clean water include roads and bridges, along with over use.

Released this week, America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2011 identifies ten rivers that face an immediate risk. Because the conservation group puts the spotlight on water bodies with a looming legal, regulatory, or development decision, constituents of the endangered list change every year.

This year, the threat to many rivers stems from mining claims that are pending regulatory approval. That is the case for the Bristol Bay rivers in Alaska, the Green River in Washington state, the Roanoke River in Virginia, and the Black Warrior River in Alabama.

Amy Kober, communications director for American Rivers, told Circle of Blue that energy extraction puts constant pressure on rivers. “Energy development has always been big, and is prominent again this year,” Kober wrote in an email.

The boom in natural gas drilling has affected water quality in many areas, as last year’s report also stated. Pennsylvania’s Susquehanna River is considered the most endangered on the list because of the wastewater produced from hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale. Conventional treatment plants are not designed to handle the salts, heavy metals, and radioactive contaminants that are introduced underground, so the waste enters surface waters essentially untreated. Drilling wastes are a similar issue for Wyoming’s Hoback River.

American Rivers took advantage of the timing of the report’s release to make special mention of the Mississippi River. Flood management, according to the report, has completely ignored the natural defenses provided by flood plains and wetlands in favor of engineered solutions that give “a false sense of security.”

The group suggests a flood management policy that does not rely solely on levees, but, rather, one that incorporates agricultural conservation and wetland restoration.

Source

Visit Circle of Blue

Visit American Rivers