logo
Already a member? Login here

Burma | Myanmar´s archives ↓

First ever bank conference to discuss Mekong dams

WWF

Financial institutions must play a more active role in promoting sustainable hydropower development in the lower Mekong river basin, says WWF.

On September 24th in Bangkok, Thailand, leading US, European and Asian financial institutions will attend a conference co-convened by WWF and other development partners to highlight the financial, social and environmental risks and responsibilities of hydropower development on the lower Mekong river. The meeting will also explore ways to understand and mitigate these risks.

“It is a missed opportunity,” said Marc Goichot, Sustainable Infrastructure Senior Advisor for WWF Greater Mekong. “Lower Mekong dam sites were selected in the 1960’s and there has not been a process to review them with the benefit of today’s science and technology.”

Currently, there are 11 hydropower dams proposed for the lower Mekong river, which runs through Laos, Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam. If the one of these dams is built it will break the lower Mekong’s ecosystem connectivity, which can have a cascade of negative impacts.

“Putting a dam on the lower Mekong River will block fish migration to spawning grounds, collapsing fish stocks,” said Michael Simon, Lead of the People Infrastructure and Environment Program, Oxfam Australia. “Do lenders want to be associated with putting the food security of 60 million people in some of the world’s poorest countries at risk?”

Forecasts show the productivity of lower Mekong fisheries, which are valued up to USD 7 billion annually, would be reduced by up to 70 percent by lower Mekong mainstream dams. In addition, iconic species such as the Mekong giant catfish and Mekong dolphin would face likely extinction if the proposed dams go ahead.

“Hydropower projects can limit their impact to ecosystem connectivity. For example, a large dam can be built in the floodplain beside a river channel rather than across it, or a hydropower project can have no dam at all,” said Mr Goichot.

In southern Laos, there is such an alternative being proposed by the Lao Department of Electricity and semi-state owned French company CNR (Compagnie Nationale du Rhone).

The proposed Thakho project is adjacent to the Mekong river at the pristine Khone Phapeng waterfalls, an epicentre for tourism in Laos. It works by diverting some water from the Mekong mainstream into a channel where it passes through turbines and back in to the Mekong down stream.

This project has no dam and does not break ecosystem connectivity, allowing for sediment to flow downstream and fish to migrate upstream. Its integrated design also allows for sustainable tourism development.

“Financial institutions are being held accountable by shareholders and the public for the financing decisions they are making. Investing in unsustainable projects is risky to reputations and bottom lines,” said Jérôme Bertrand-Hardy, Deputy Chief Investment Officer at Proparco. “By better managing social and environmental risks, banks can better secure their investment.”

WWF supports a ten-year delay in the approval of lower Mekong river mainstream dams to ensure a comprehensive understanding of all the impacts of their construction and operation. Immediate electricity demands can be met by fast tracking the most sustainable hydropower sites on the lower Mekong’s tributaries.

“Allowing time for innovative technologies and science to inform the lower Mekong river basin’s development plans creates a win-win situation for all parties involved,” said Mr Goichot.

Presentations from the meeting can be downloaded from here.

For more on the Mekong dams visit http://mouthtosource.org/rivers/mekong/?s=hydropower

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Laos sees big fish as small price to pay for hydropower

The gloves are now definitely off in regard to the mainstream damming on the Lower Mekong. After reading this piece follow the links to review the presentations given to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs on Thursday in Washington DC.

The timing is everything.

Jonathan Watts reports for The Guardian

Plans for hydropower plant on the Mekong River threaten habitat of four of the world’s largest freshwater fish, says WWF

Despite the risks to the world’s biggest freshwater fish, Laos has rejected calls for a dam moratorium on the lower reaches of the Mekong because it wants cheap power to develop its economy.

The south-east Asian nation moved this week to secure regional approval for the first major hydropower plant on its stretch of the river in the face of protests from international conservation groups.

Catfish the length of cars and stingrays that weigh more than tigers are threatened by the proposed 800m barrier, but the government said the economic benefits outweigh the environmental risks.

“We don’t want to be poor any more,” said Viraphone Viravong, director general of the country’s energy and mines department. “If we want to grow, we need this dam.”

In a submission to the Mekong river commission (MRC) on Wednesday, Laos said it wants to build a 1.26GW-hydropower plant at Sayabouly in northern Laos to generate foreign exchange income.

If approved, about 90% of the electricity would be sold to neighbours Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia.

It is part of a major plan to expand the economy through the utilisation of natural resources. According to Viravong, 20% of Laos’ GDP will come from hydropower and mining by 2020, up from about 4% today.

Sayabouly is the first of 11 proposed dams on the lower reaches of the Mekong, a river that is already heavily dammed upstream in China.

The MMRC (I think Jonathan means MRC here-Admin) – made up of representatives from Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand – will now assess the environmental impact of the project, but conservation groups fear the procedure is flawed and have called for a 10-year moratorium on hydropower on the river.

“This dam is the greatest challenge the MRC has faced since it was formed. It is the most serious test of its usefulness and relevance,” said Marc Goichot, of the WWF. “It is already very clear this dam would amplify and accelerate the negative impacts of Chinese dams to the Mekong delta. What are the other impacts?”

Concerns have been raised about sedimentation, fisheries and the migration patterns of endangered freshwater species.

Four of the world’s 10 biggest freshwater fish migrate up the Mekong to spawn. Among them is the Mekong giant catfish, which is the size of a bull shark, and the Mekong stingray, which can weigh up to 600kg.

The dam – which is being designed by Swiss company Colencois and the Thai contractors Karnchang – is also likely to affect the flow of nutrients along a delta that sustains tens of millions of people.

The Laos authorities insist the dam will be designed to mitigate the impact on food security, ecosystems and wildlife, but officials acknowledge that no solution is ideal for the environment.

“It won’t be 100% perfect, but we believe mitigation measures will be effective. We must balance out the costs and benefits,” said Viravong.

He felt there was no alternative. “We have done studies on micro-energy and renewables, but they are expensive. I don’t think the world can subsidise that. If we do it ourselves, only cheap energy from hydropower will do.”

Read also from The Senate Foreign Relations Committee chaired by Senator Jim Webb of Virginia on Thursday, 23rd Sept 2010:

Speakers were:

Mr. Joseph Yun
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Southeast Asia
Washington, DC

Download Testimony

Dr. Richard Cronin
Senior Associate,
The Stimson Center
Washington, DC

Download Testimony

Ms. Aviva Imhof
Campaigns Director
International Rivers
Berkeley, CA

Download Testimony

Ms. Dekila Chungyalpa
Director for the Greater Mekong Program
World Wildlife Fund
Washington, DC

Download Testimony

Source

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Mangrove Forest Under Threat in Post-Nargis Delta

The Irrawaddy

With no other means of livelihood, villagers strip mangrove forests for firewood

Myanmar Mangroves | NASA Earth Observatory


Myanmar Mangrove Key | USGS ecologists produced this map of mangrove deforestation in Burma’s (Myanmar’s) Irrawaddy Delta using an older version of the Global Land Survey dataset. Recent improvements are allowing them to map mangrove deforestation worldwide. (Map adapted by Robert Simmon from Giri et al., 2008.)

The slow pace of rebuilding livelihoods in the cyclone-hit Irrawaddy delta is taking a serious toll on the region’s mangrove forests, as growing numbers of people turn to collecting firewood as their job of last resort, environmental groups in Rangoon say.

“More and more local people are cutting down trees in the mangrove forests to make a living,” said an official from the Forest Resource Environment Development and Conservation Association (FREDA), a Rangoon-based NGO.

“This job doesn’t require any investment. All you need is a machete, so those who can’t find any other way to earn money do this to make ends meet.”

Farming and fishing are the main occupations in the region, but both industries are still reeling from the effects of Tropical Cyclone Nargis, which slammed into Burma in 2008 and turned into the most destructive natural disaster in Burma’s history.

A wall of water 12 to 15 feet high, undeterred because many mangrove swamps along the coast already had been torn out for seafood farms, raced 25 miles inland, sowing unimaginable destruction. The Burmese government estimated a toll of about 90,000 dead and 56,000 missing. That figure has since been updated to about 130,000 dead. Nargis also wrecked as much as 65 percent of Burma’s rice crop—at least 200,000 hectares of the Irrawaddy Delta were ruined. Hitting just a few days after the harvest was completed, Nargis also wiped out much of the crop in warehouses.

The further destruction of the mangrove forests removes a critical bastion against future storm surges. Nonetheless, the villagers say they have no choice.

“Almost all of us have problems,” said one farmer from Laputta Township. “Tens of thousands of rats have destroyed our rice fields. We couldn’t even keep seed paddy. As a result, we don’t have rice to sell and we can’t pay off our debts.”

Fishermen say they are also struggling, as catch sizes—of fish, shrimp and crabs—are too small to even feed their own families.

“Since the cyclone, catches are much smaller. The fishery isn’t doing so well, so [fishermen] can barely feed themselves,” said an official from the Laputta Township Fishery Department.

With their traditional sources of income no longer providing adequate means of survival, many in the delta have had little choice but to seek out other ways to eke out a living. But their choice of alternative employment is putting a severe strain on already vulnerable natural ecosystems—and officials and environmentalists fear it will only get worse.

“The smaller trees can be used for firewood, but they’re also cutting down larger hardwood trees that can be used for building houses,” said a Forestry Department official. The pace at which some forests have been stripped has alarmed many.

“Coastal areas with thick mangrove forests have become open expanses within days or months,” said one environmental activist. “But villagers say they will die of starvation if they can’t cut down the trees for sale.”

An official from the Forestry Ministry said that efforts should be made to find new jobs for people in the region to prevent any further deterioration of the mangrove forests.

However, environmental analysts say the authorities should also do more to help regrow the forests. They complain that so far efforts have been very limited, with most of the work being done by NGOs.

“The cyclone destroyed the mangrove forest. Then, after the cyclone, people increased their cutting of trees. Very few areas have been replanted—and those mostly by organizations such as FREDA. The government has provided very little support,” said a well-known environmental activist who asked to remain anonymous.

According to official statistics, there are about 450,000 hectares of mangrove forest in Burma, of which more than 38,000 hectares in Irrawaddy and Rangoon divisions were destroyed by Cyclone Nargis.

Read article…

Visit The Irrawaddy

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Water is a good servant but a bad master

IRIN

JOHANNESBURG, 4 August 2010 (IRIN) - The floods in northwest Pakistan could be a foretaste of things to come if you go by a recent report warning that in the next two decades factors like climate change could make water-related humanitarian crises a new source of concern.

The waters of the Third Pole, produced by the Humanitarian Futures Programme at King’s College, London, said the region was not prepared to deal with such crises.

The flooded part of Pakistan lies in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan (HKH) region, billed as the most disaster-prone in the world, according to the Nepal-based International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), which serves as a regional policy think-tank for its eight member countries.

The HKH region is sometimes referred to as the Third Pole because it has the largest expanse of frozen water outside the Polar Regions.

“The supply and quality of water in this region are under extreme threat, both from the effects of human activity, and from natural processes and [climate] variation,” said the report. The 10 rivers originating in the region provide water to 20 percent of the world’s population, and flow across countries “fraught with cross-border tensions”, often prompted by water sharing and dam construction.

Conflict, mass migration and food insecurity could make water-related crises even more daunting and politically sensitive; defusing these crises would require a more proactive role by regional humanitarian aid players said Randolph Kent, director the Humanitarian Futures programme.

Traditional humanitarian organisations would “have to be less intrusive, and more able to support local and regional prevention, preparedness and response capacities,” he suggested.

Climate change, one of the main natural drivers, is expected to exacerbate “flooding and its virulence in the region in the months and years to come”, ICIMOD noted on its website.

But “perhaps nowhere else on earth” will the impact of climate change be “more significant” than in the HKH region, “with huge volumes of water moving from mountains to sea [caused by glacial melt in the Hindu Kush and Himalayan ranges],” the report said.

The 10 large Asian river systems – the Amu Darya, Indus, Ganges, Brahmaputra (or Yarlungtsanpo), Irrawaddy, Salween (or Nu), Mekong or Lancang, Yangtse (or Jinsha), Yellow River (or Huanghe), and Tarim (or Dayan) - provide water to more than a billion people and support more than 210 million directly.

Besides meeting the demands of a rapidly expanding population in an area with considerable human conflict, the region is a highly active geologic zone, making it “one of the world’s most dynamic, complex and intensive risk hotspots”, Kent commented.

The HKH region covers the whole of Bhutan and Nepal, about half the territories of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Myanmar, China has a foothold of about 17 percent, India has 14 percent and Bangladesh eight percent, according to ICIMOD.

How prepared are so many countries, with most of the world’s population sharing the same resources, to act in concert? “How, in other words, would regional actors, working in cooperation, deal with the impact of a major flood affecting the India-Pakistan borders, at the same time a cyclone hits the coastline of Bangladesh?”

The region would have to come up with a new way of planning its response to crises while reducing its vulnerability. “Vulnerability will need to be the main focus,” said Kent. Countries would have to map vulnerable populations and areas regionally, and construct future scenarios to help prepare for disasters.

Too negative?

ICIMOD’s Arun Shreshtha was more cautious. “Presenting a very negative scenario of conflicts across the region will not help, and a growing number of opinions suggest that the type of conflict, as postulated, will not happen,” he told IRIN. Nevertheless, there was “certainly a lack of cooperation in scientific cooperation and knowledge sharing across the region”.

This is changing. ICIMOD has initiated a programme of regional cooperation in sharing flood information. “We are in discussion with national stakeholders regarding a long-term regional collaboration in the Indus,” Shreshtha said. “A similar initiative is proposed for the Kosi [River] Basin,” which flows through Nepal and India.

The response from the “scientific community has been quite positive, and we are optimistic of a ‘trickle-up effect’”, he said, but there were gaps in information on the impact of climate change on glacial melt, and how this would affect water supply. Melt rates varied regionally, and in monsoon areas the rainfall regime rather than glacial melt would determine the impact on water supply.

“We do not have good handle on these issues, and unless these basic scientific questions are answered we cannot expect to be prepared for the consequences. In my opinion, the emphasis should be on the improvement of the knowledge base.”

This is one of the points made in the Third Pole report. “The region has to set up an essential futures-oriented analysis to narrow knowledge gaps, where possible, to help them respond better,” Kent said.

Shreshtha pointed out that “The people of the region have been facing these problems for ever, and have developed some amount of resilience. Certainly, the magnitude of risk has increased, and additional adaptation interventions are necessary, but it is not practical to picture the community as helpless.”

[Ed-Apols for full quote]

Source

Visit IRIN

IRIN is a project of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

China’s Shadow Looms Over the Mekong

By Steve Hirsch for Radio Free Asia

Fishermen and farmers in downstream countries are protesting the impact of China’s dams. But experts say that the dams also give China a huge potential for geopolitical influence.

WASHINGTON—Experts are raising concerns over the strategic implications of China’s construction of Mekong River dams.

China plans eight dams, four of which have been built. Moreover, according to Richard Cronin, head of the Southeast Asia program at the Henry L. Stimson Center in Washington, Cambodia and Laos are planning 11 dams on the lower half of the Mekong, four involving Chinese developers.

At issue is the dams’ interference with food fish spawning and migration, which, Cronin said, has already been observed in China’s southern Yunnan province and northern Laos since the Manwan Dam came online in 1993.

Now that the massive Xiaowan Dam has been completed, China’s ability to store or release huge quantities of water to meet changing power demands and support dry-season navigation is expected to have impacts on fisheries far down the river. The impact could reach as far as the Tonle Sap in Cambodia, if not the Mekong Delta in Vietnam.

These water levels are important because of such direct effects as their impact on downstream agriculture and potential for flooding. Downstream dams’ year-around operation and generation of electricity also depend on sufficient water coming down from China.

Marvin C. Ott, professor of national security policy at the National War College, said the project would appear to be a boon for Chinese strategists interested in increasing China’s geopolitical influence in Southeast Asia, which he believes “is a central Chinese preoccupation for its strategic community.”

Cambodian officials, for example, he said, might be relatively successfully trying to maintain a sovereign foreign and security policy, balancing the influence of surrounding countries and the United States, “but now, suddenly, China has a lever … that changes the whole calculus.”

Read article…

Visit RFA

See The Mekong | Mouth to Source for more articles on hydropower on The Mekong

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

China's "Charm Offensive" Loses Momentum in Southeast Asia [Part II]

By Ian Storey for China Brief Volume: 10 Issue: 10

The change in Southeast Asian attitudes toward China’s growing economic profile in the region and its military build-up in the South China Sea is significant (See “China’s “Charm Offensive” Losing Momentum in Southeast Asia [Part I],” China Brief, April 29). In mainland Southeast Asia, governments have not only been worried about the rising tide of Chinese imports, but also the environmental impact of Chinese dams in Yunnan province that some groups claim have led to falling water levels in the Mekong River. In addition to having to respond to these accusations, Beijing has also had to contend with the political instability that continues to flare up in two of its closest partners in Southeast Asia—Burma (Myanmar) and Thailand—and the potential negative economic fallout on its southwestern provinces.

China’s Public Relations Debacle on the Mekong River

During his speech to the Jakarta-based Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Secretariat in January 2010, State Councilor Dai Bingguo declared China and Southeast Asia to be inseparably joined by “mountains and rivers” [1]. Yet the most important of these rivers—the 3,000-mile long Mekong, also known as Lancang in Chinese, which rises in the Tibetan plateau and flows down through Burma, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam—has become a bone of contention in ASEAN-China relations. The root of the problem is that water levels have fallen to their lowest point in nearly half a century, and this is adversely affecting the livelihoods of more than 65 million people in the Mekong Basin who depend on the river for drinking water, irrigation, fishing and transportation. Environmentalists have blamed record low water levels on dams constructed along the upper reaches of the river in Yunnan province where the Chinese authorities have planned a cascade of eight hydroelectric dams; three are already in operation, two more are nearing completion [2]. The most controversial of these hydroelectric projects is the Xiaowan Dam, which at 958-feet is the largest arch dam in the world and the second biggest dam in China after the Three Gorges. Filling the Xiaowan’s 73-square mile reservoir began in 2009, and is expected to be completed in 2012. Critics claim the dam filling is draining water off downstream areas and wreaking environmental havoc. They accuse Beijing of being insensitive to the problems faced by the lower riparian countries.

Although the problem of falling water levels in the Mekong has been apparent for several years, regional governments—some of which have close ties to Beijing—have been reluctant to confront China for fear of losing economic aid. Yet as the situation has worsened, Southeast Asian officials have become less reticent about raising the issue with their Chinese counterparts. The most high-level expression of concern occurred in March when Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva told visiting Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Hu Zhengyue that Thailand expected China’s cooperation in dealing with the problem (Straits Times, March 8). Although Abhisit did not criticize China directly, his message was clear: The PRC must take account of regional concerns and act accordingly.

Read article… Part II

“China’s “Charm Offensive” Losing Momentum in Southeast Asia [Part I]

Visit The Jamestown Foundation

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Water shortages sweeping Burma

By MIN LWIN with additional reporting from NAW NOREEN for The Democratic Voice of Burma

Lakes and freshwater wells in central Burma are drying up, fuelled by hot weather and abnormal river flows resulting from hydropower projects.

A local in Sagaing division’s capital, Monywa, said that wells were drying up in every ward of the city. “The well in our ward dried up and now everyone is out of water,” he said.

Water levels on the Irrawaddy river and its largest tributary, the Chindwin river, which flows through Sagaing division, are low, and sand banks are appearing with increasing frequency.

The Mekong river, which supports millions of people from China to Cambodia, is at its lowest level in nearly half a century, largely as a resulting of heavy damming by the Chinese.

Residents of Pyin Oo Lwin, in central Burma’s Mandalay division, said that villages located south of Myit Nge river were also suffering water shortages because a hydropower dam recently built upstream had blocked the channel.

Read article…

Visit The Democratic Voice of Burma

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Four wounded in grenade attack at Myanmar power project

AFP

YANGON, April 27 (AFP) - A series of grenade blasts hit a hydropower project in Myanmar Tuesday, wounding four workers in the latest unrest in the military-ruled country, officials said.

The attacks occurred at the Thaukyegat hydropower plant under construction in Bago Division, about 220 kilometres (137 miles) northeast of the country’s main city Yangon, a local official told AFP.

“Four workers were injured during three grenade attacks at the Thaukyegat hydropower project site,” the official said, asking not to be named because he was not authorised to speak to the media.

The Myanmar company behind the project, Asia World Construction, was also involved in a controversial dam project in Kachin State where there was a series of bombs blasts earlier this month, injuring one engineer.

Three other bombs on April 15 hit a water festival in Yangon, in the city’s worst attack in five years. The death toll from that attack has now risen to 10 people, with at least 170 people wounded.

Myanmar authorities have arrested some suspects in their search for the perpetrators of those blasts, officials said, but they did not give any further detail as the investigation is still underway.

Myanmar has been hit by several bomb blasts in recent years which the junta has blamed on armed exile groups or ethnic rebels.

Read article…

Visit mysinchew.com

Visit Agence France Presse

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

Complaint on impacts and proposal about dams on the upper Mekong River in China

In a letter for the attention of: The Prime Minister of the People’s Republic of China

Attachments:

1. Statement to the Chinese Government “Third Complaint to Chinese Government” (http://www.mekonglover.com/news_pop.asp? NewsId=151)

2. Study titled “Two Important Lessons from Mekong Mainstream Dams in China” (http://www.mekonglover.com/news_pop.asp? NewsId=141)

3. Book titled “Local cultural ecology and natural resource management in the Mekong Basin: A Case Study of the Mekong River-Lanna area”

Since the People’s Republic of China built four dams on the upper Mekong River, the people in downstream countries, namely Burma, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam, have suffered impacts on their ecosystems, food security, culture, economy, and society. The Peoples Republic of China has constantly ignored the petition letters from affected downstream communities.

We, the network of affected people, who have monitored the impacts of dams on the upper stretch of the Mekong River for over a decade, deliver a petition letter to the Chinese Government in the attached package and proposals to the Chinese government as follows:

1. The Chinese Government must stop building all dams on the upper Mekong River’s mainstream.

2. The Chinese Government must stop pursuing the Mekong River Rapids Blasting Project.

3. The Chinese Government must release data that details their operation of the upper Mekong dams and the past records of the river conditions before the dams were built.

4. The Chinese government is urged to ratify the ‘UN Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses’ and to encourage other Mekong countries to also ratify it. This would ensure that the future utilization of the river’s resources guarantees the sustainability of the ecosystem and shares the benefits in a just way

5. The Chinese government must cooperate with other Mekong governments to establish a joint committee, in which people affected by dams and blasting projects from each country are represented, to study and seek ways to manage the river in a just and sustainable way

6. The commission’s mission is also to revise the management of the four completed dams on the upper Mekong River and to seek approaches on managing their reservoirs without causing impacts to the downstream communities. The commission should also assess damage from the implemented projects and explore ways for the Chinese Government to compensate in the form of a fund to restore the ecology, culture, economy and society of the downstream communities.

We hereby present you with this letter with the aim of peacefully achieving a joint solution

Thai Peoples’ Network for the Mekong; Mekong-Lanna Natural Resources and Cultural Conservation Network; Chiang Kong Conservation Group; Eco- Culture Study Group/ Isan Human Rights and Peace Information Center; Hug Nam Khong; Towards Ecological Recovery and Regional Alliance (TERRA); Mekong Energy and Ecology Network (MEE Net); Living River Siam (SEARIN)

Source

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF

India eyes $5.6bn Burma hydropower deal

By JOSEPH ALLCHIN for The Democratic Voice of Burma

India’s state-owned National Hydro Power Company Limited (NHPC) will increase its investment in Burma to the tune of an extra $US5.6 billion as Burma aggressively expands its energy sector.

The head of the NHPC, S K Garg, told the Wall Street Journal the company was “inching towards Myanmar [Burma]. We have already sent our team to Myanmar for further survey and investigation for two projects.”

Little is known of the location of the projects, but the Wall Street Journal suggests that they could be two new 510-megawatt and 520-megawatt dams.

The NHPC already has a major presence in the country, primarily at the Tamanthi dam on the Chindwin river in Burma’s northern Sagaing division. The project has a capability of providing 1200 megawatts of electricity, 80 percent of which it is believed will go straight to India.

Read article…

Visit The Democratic Voice of Burma

Share this article
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF
Page 1 of 2:1 2 »
start free
© 2010 Mouth to Source